党中央制定的政策，都经过深入调研和科学论证，具有全局性和系统性。深入贯彻落实党中央决策部 署，不是随意取舍的"选择题"，而是要压茬推进的"必答题"。在政策执行中，决不能以功利心态挑肥拣 瘦，不能像市场交易那般算计"性价比"，必须坚决摒弃地方保护主义和部门本位主义，杜绝只想自己搞 选择性落实、只顾表面搞象征性执行。必须树立全国一盘棋思想，把工作放在党和国家大局中去思考谋 划，多从大处着眼，算大账、总账、长远账，主动对标对表、盘点归整，确保政策执行不偏向、不变 通、不走样，如拼图般精准契合。 当然，强调政策的刚性执行，并不是搞"一刀切""上下一般粗"，而是要坚持结合实际、分类施策。实现 顶层设计和基层探索良性互动，既要在政策执行中始终牢记"国之大者"，切实提高政治站位，保持战略 定力，强化责任担当，以"时时放心不下"的责任感狠抓落实；又要坚持实事求是、因地制宜，在吃透政 策精神的基础上，结合本地实际创造性开展工作，注重政策执行的精准性、实效性，以钉钉子精神一锤 接着一锤敲，推动实现政策统一性和执行创造性的有机结合，确保党中央决策部署条条落实、件件落 地、事事见效，让政策红利更好惠及广大人民群众。 《 人民日报 》 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need to eliminate the soil that breeds sycophancy by internalizing relevant prohibitions as universally adhered principles, treating both excessive enforcement and inaction equally with strict penalties [1][5]. Group 1: Policy Execution and Public Sentiment - Strict enforcement against violations related to dining is crucial for upholding the spirit of the Central Eight Regulations, but some local implementations have deviated, leading to public concern [1][2]. - The article highlights that a bowl of noodles costing less than 10 yuan was fined 3000 yuan, and there were instances of late-night inspections and surveillance of dining habits, which intruded into personal lives [1][2]. - The commentary from People’s Daily underscores that while addressing violations is essential to combat corruption, it should not suppress normal social interactions and daily life [1][2]. Group 2: Root Causes of Policy Deviation - The article identifies the "sycophantic mentality" as a fundamental reason for the distortion of policy execution, where local officials may over-implement policies to stand out and gain rewards [3][4]. - It notes that some higher-level departments may tolerate or even encourage excessive measures, leading to a culture where overstepping is rewarded while adherence to policy is overlooked [3][4]. - The revised Disciplinary Regulations of the Communist Party of China in December 2023 outline penalties for behaviors that cause significant harm or negative impact, emphasizing accountability for those responsible [3][4]. Group 3: Future Implications and Recommendations - The article suggests that while recent public scrutiny has helped curb the issue of distorted enforcement in dining violations, similar problems may arise in other areas [4][5]. - It advocates for treating excessive enforcement and inaction with equal severity in penalties to fundamentally eradicate sycophantic behavior and prevent formalism [5].