新业态劳动者权益保护

Search documents
法治助力 “小哥”权益更有保障(法治头条)
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-04-23 22:07
Group 1 - The article highlights the increasing attention on the protection of rights for new economy workers, such as delivery and courier personnel, through legislative, enforcement, judicial, and legal service efforts [2] - It presents typical cases where judicial authorities have upheld the rights of delivery workers, showcasing how legal support has become more accessible and effective [2] - The case of Liu, a delivery rider who suffered an accident, illustrates the challenges in claiming workers' compensation due to the complexities of labor relations in the gig economy [3][5] Group 2 - Liu's case emphasizes the difficulties in establishing a labor relationship when workers are classified as independent contractors, complicating the process of claiming work-related injury compensation [5] - A breakthrough occurred when it was discovered that Liu's employer had purchased employer liability insurance, which ultimately led to a successful settlement of 130,000 yuan in compensation [6] - The article also discusses the role of legal aid in supporting vulnerable workers, highlighting the importance of evidence collection and legal advocacy in securing workers' rights [6] Group 3 - The article details another case involving a couple who faced wage arrears while working for a third-party labor company, illustrating the prevalence of wage theft in the gig economy [7][9] - The prosecution's intervention led to a swift resolution, with the couple recovering their owed wages within ten days, showcasing the effectiveness of legal support in labor disputes [9] - The article notes the need for better regulation of labor outsourcing practices to prevent similar issues from recurring in the future [10] Group 4 - A separate case involving a delivery worker named Feng highlights the liability of property management companies in ensuring safety for delivery personnel [11] - The court ruled that the property management company was responsible for Feng's injuries due to negligence in operating the entrance gate [11] - The case also addresses the interaction between occupational injury compensation and third-party liability, clarifying that both can coexist without offsetting each other [12][13]