Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing attempts by Japanese right-wing factions to revise historical narratives surrounding Japan's actions during World War II, particularly the attack on Pearl Harbor, reflecting a broader trend of historical denialism and militaristic resurgence in Japan [1][2][3][4] Group 1: Historical Revisionism - Japanese right-wing figures, such as former Air Self-Defense Force Chief Toshio Tamogami, publicly claim that the U.S. framed Japan for the Pearl Harbor attack, indicating a long-standing effort to alter the narrative of Japan's wartime actions [1] - The narrative constructed by Japanese nationalists suggests that the attack was a defensive measure against perceived threats from the U.S. and its allies, a claim that has persisted even after Japan's defeat in the war [2] Group 2: Justification of Actions - During the war, Japanese militarists framed their aggression as a liberation struggle against Western colonial powers, asserting that their actions were justified as self-defense [3] - The glorification of military leaders and the perpetuation of a "glorious" narrative surrounding Japan's wartime actions continue to be promoted by right-wing groups, with artifacts from the war being venerated in places like Yasukuni Shrine [3] Group 3: Strategic Manipulation - Japanese right-wing factions attempt to separate the narrative of wartime aggression from contemporary peace efforts, advocating for a reinterpretation of history that downplays Japan's militaristic past [4] - The push for collective self-defense and military rearmament is framed under the guise of loyalty to allies, while simultaneously undermining the post-war peace framework established after World War II [4]