Group 1 - The debate on the passing score for autonomous driving cars has intensified, with opinions divided on whether it should be set at 60, 80, or 90 points [1][2] - Professor Zhu Xichan argues that a score of 60 should suffice for L2 level autonomous driving cars, criticizing Huawei's stringent standards that require a score of 80 [1][2] - The discussion is catalyzed by a recent tragic accident involving a Xiaomi vehicle, prompting calls for more comprehensive regulations [3] Group 2 - The proposed strong standard (强标) aims to establish safety requirements for L2 level autonomous driving systems, with a project duration of 22 months [2][3] - The drafting of the strong standard has faced criticism for its high difficulty, with complex testing scenarios that may not be feasible for many manufacturers [4][5] - Industry leaders express concerns that the stringent requirements could reshape the autonomous driving sector, potentially disadvantaging smaller companies [4][6] Group 3 - Companies are currently testing their autonomous driving solutions against the proposed strong standard, but uncertainty remains about whether existing systems will comply [5][6] - The introduction of the strong standard may lead to increased costs for autonomous driving systems, as companies may need to enhance their technology and sensor capabilities [5][6] - The strong standard's implications could favor companies like Huawei that are better equipped to meet high standards, while posing challenges for others in the market [6][7] Group 4 - Zhu Xichan suggests a tiered scoring system for the strong standard, with 60 points as the minimum requirement, 80 points for regular consumer needs, and 100 points for top-tier performance [7] - The final outcome of the strong standard is still under discussion, with the industry awaiting its official release [8]