服务大局
Search documents
“四个维度”树立和践行正确政绩观
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-02-15 00:02
Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Procuratorate emphasizes the establishment and practice of a correct performance view, making a significant decision of "one cancellation and three non-recurrences" to fundamentally reverse the "data-only" orientation and promote the return of procuratorial work to high-quality and efficient case handling [2] Group 1: Political Construction - The procuratorial agency is primarily a political organization, and the correct performance view must prioritize political construction to ensure the correct political direction of procuratorial work [2] - A guiding principle of "deep integration of party building and business" is established, requiring the absolute leadership of the party to be concretized and implemented throughout the entire process of procuratorial duties [2] Group 2: Service to the Overall Situation - The procuratorial agency must take on political and legal responsibilities to serve and guarantee the overall work of the party and the state, focusing on major decisions and tasks of the Party Central Committee and local party committees [4] - Evaluation of the effectiveness of serving the overall situation should focus on whether procuratorial duties accurately address key areas of economic and social development and produce substantial assistance [4] Group 3: Case Handling Quality and Efficiency - The fundamental pursuit of procuratorial duties is to handle each case with high quality and efficiency, emphasizing the importance of accurate fact-finding, appropriate legal application, and procedural compliance [5] - A new evaluation system based on "three managements" is proposed, focusing on business management, case management, and quality management to ensure comprehensive oversight and accountability [5] Group 4: Practical Responsibility - A correct performance view relies on a team of prosecutors who are willing to take responsibility and are adept at practical work, emphasizing the need to avoid formalism and bureaucratism [6] - The evaluation system should include a focus on actual performance and effectiveness, linking case quality review results with judicial responsibility accountability [6]