民调

Search documents
美媒提到民调中过半受访者认为美国经济状况恶化,特朗普回应:换个民调员
Huan Qiu Wang· 2025-09-19 01:22
据报道,特朗普18日在英国接受美国福克斯新闻节目专访。特朗普谈论政府正在增加制造业就业岗位时,节目主持人玛莎·麦卡勒姆对特朗 普说,"你认为人们什么时候能够感受到效果?我们确实看到经济领域的民调数据不佳。福克斯最近的民调显示,52%的受访者认为本届政 府执政期间经济状况恶化。失业率已达近四年新高,食品价格大幅上涨。总统先生,您刚才提到的这些计划何时能让民众感受到效果?" 对此,特朗普回答说,"等工厂开始运转的时候。现在我们正在建设新的工厂。至于福克斯民调,我必须说这是我见到过的最差劲民调,我 以前就提过,大选期间他们说我以微弱优势领先,而不是大幅领先。我已告诉过鲁伯特·默多克:快找个新民调员,现在这个简直烂透了。 这种情况持续很多年了。" 【环球网报道】据美国《新闻周刊》报道,美国总统特朗普当地时间9月18日接受福克斯新闻网采访,主持人提到近期民调显示过半受访者 认为本届政府执政期间美国经济状况恶化。对此,特朗普要求福克斯新闻网换个民意调查员。 据报道,福克斯新闻网9月6日至9日进行的全国民调显示,52%受访者认为特朗普政府使经济状况恶化,30%的受访者认为特朗普政府改善 了经济,18%的人则认为没有变化。值 ...
韩国大选热度或打破纪录:四位前总统站台,候选人“三足鼎立”
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-06-02 13:10
Group 1 - The upcoming South Korean presidential election is crucial for the country's future policies, especially in balancing relations between China and the United States [1] - The election, originally scheduled for 2027, has been moved up to June 3 due to the impeachment of former President Yoon Suk-yeol [1][3] - Five candidates are competing, with Lee Jae-myung from the Democratic Party leading in polls with 49.2% support, followed by Kim Moon-soo from the ruling People Power Party at 36.8% and Lee Jun-suk at 10.3% [1] Group 2 - A total of 14,295 polling stations will be set up for approximately 44.39 million voters, with polling hours from 6 AM to 8 PM [3] - The early voting period saw a participation of 15.42 million voters, resulting in a turnout rate of 34.74%, the second highest in history [6][8] - The high early voting turnout is attributed to public sentiment against the previous administration's actions, indicating a strong desire for change [8][12] Group 3 - Former presidents are actively campaigning for their preferred candidates, with Yoon Suk-yeol endorsing Kim Moon-soo and former President Moon Jae-in emphasizing the need for accountability in the election [5][11] - The election is seen as a referendum on the previous administration, with significant public interest in the outcome [3][11] - The candidates have engaged in televised debates, but the discussions have been criticized for lacking depth and devolving into personal attacks [12]