Core Viewpoint - The dispute between former Hubei billionaire Lan Shili and Jinlongyu (Golden Dragon Fish) has escalated from a defamation case into a complex legal battle involving execution procedures and public statements [3][25]. Group 1: Background of the Dispute - The conflict originated from a video posted by Lan Shili in July 2024, where he accused Jinlongyu of improper practices, claiming that the company lost 650 billion in two days and should be the first to delist [3][4]. - Jinlongyu's parent company, Yihai Kerry, sued Lan for defamation, leading to a court ruling that found Lan guilty of infringement, requiring him to apologize and pay 30,700 yuan [8][9]. Group 2: Developments in the Legal Proceedings - On November 20, 2025, Lan held a press conference claiming that despite transferring 100,000 yuan to Jinlongyu, his account was still frozen due to the company's application for enforcement [4][6]. - Yihai Kerry stated that the enforcement was lawful, as Lan did not comply with the court's ruling in a timely manner, and they later returned the excess payment of 69,300 yuan after unfreezing his account [9][11]. Group 3: Public Statements and Reactions - Both parties have issued conflicting statements, with Jinlongyu accusing Lan of spreading false information regarding the refund and account status, while Lan insists that he fulfilled his payment obligations [7][10]. - Lan provided evidence of his payment and claimed that the enforcement action taken by Jinlongyu was unjustified, suggesting that the company concealed the receipt of his payment [14][22]. Group 4: Legal Implications and Future Actions - The case has raised questions about the execution of court orders, particularly regarding the distinction between monetary compensation and the obligation to apologize [24][25]. - Lan has indicated plans to appeal to the Shanghai High Court, suggesting that the legal battle is far from over [25].