Core Insights - The article discusses the evolution and differentiation of AI Agents, emphasizing the need to distinguish between genuine innovative companies and those merely capitalizing on the concept of AI Agents [1][19][22]. Group 1: AI Agent Framework - The operation of AI Agents is broken down into three layers: perception, decision-making, and execution, highlighting the importance of each layer in the overall functionality of AI Agents [10][14][15]. - The "white horse is not a horse" concept is introduced to analyze the diversity of AI Agents in the market, categorizing them into pure, neutral, and free forms based on their operational characteristics [17][18]. Group 2: Technological Evolution - The article identifies the internalization of Agentic capabilities as a necessary evolution for LLMs, with examples from OpenAI's o4-mini and Anthropic's Claude 4 showcasing different design philosophies [30][38]. - Engineering integration is increasingly contributing to model capabilities, with tools like Prompt Engineering revealing significant potential for Agent products [2][31]. Group 3: Multi-Agent Systems - The limitations of Single-Agent systems are discussed, including memory constraints and the complexity of tool interactions, leading to the conclusion that Multi-Agent systems are becoming essential for overcoming these challenges [79][80]. - Multi-Agent architectures offer advantages in complexity, robustness, and scalability, allowing for parallel exploration of solutions and improved adaptability to human collaboration [82][83]. Group 4: Future Directions - The article suggests that the future of AI Agents will involve a competition between "experience universality" and "deep reliability," with hybrid architectures likely becoming a common choice [40][41]. - The emergence of protocols like MCP (Model Context Protocol) and A2A (Agent-to-Agent Protocol) is highlighted as a significant development in facilitating communication and tool integration among AI Agents [61][70].