Group 1 - The article discusses a comparative test conducted by the Hangzhou Consumer Rights Protection Committee on swimming goggles to help consumers make informed choices [1][2] - The test combined questionnaire surveys and objective testing based on industry standards QB/T 4734-2023, focusing on various performance indicators [1][3] Group 2 - A total of 22 swimming goggles were purchased, including 5 from physical stores and 17 from online platforms, covering popular brands such as Li Ning, 361°, and Decathlon [1][2] - The testing included assessments of appearance quality, optical performance, physical performance, and functionality [1][4][13][14] Group 3 - The optical performance tests included key indicators such as transmittance uniformity, spherical power, cylindrical power, and minimum optical aperture, with results indicating varying performance among brands [5][7][10][12] - The physical performance tests showed that all 22 products met the industry standards, with specific brands like YOTTOY and Arena performing particularly well [13][18] Group 4 - The functionality test focused on anti-fog performance, with several brands exceeding the industry standard requirements [14][18] - Recommendations for consumers include selecting compliant products, ensuring a comfortable fit, and prioritizing anti-fog features [22][23][24]