Core Viewpoint - The recent judicial interpretation regarding "door opening accidents" aims to clarify the responsibilities of all parties involved, thereby protecting the legitimate rights of the injured parties and promoting a cooperative economic environment [1][2][4]. Group 1: Legal Clarification and Protection of Rights - The judicial interpretation specifies that if a passenger opens a car door causing harm, the liability falls on the vehicle owner, allowing the injured party to claim compensation from the vehicle's insurance [1][2]. - This clarification is significant as it addresses the long-standing ambiguity in liability determination for "door opening accidents," which has varied widely across different regions [1][2]. - The interpretation supports the injured party's rights by ensuring that both compulsory and commercial liability insurance are accountable for compensation, thus minimizing disputes [2][3]. Group 2: Economic and Social Implications - The regulation of "door opening accidents" reflects broader governance rules in economic and social contexts, emphasizing the importance of clear rights and responsibilities to facilitate effective cooperation [2][4]. - The principle of minimizing economic and social costs underlies the legal framework, aiming to enhance transaction efficiency and reduce risks associated with economic interactions [2][3]. - The focus on assigning liability to the vehicle owner rather than the passenger helps create a compatible incentive structure, ultimately benefiting the injured party and maintaining traffic order [3][4].