Core Viewpoint - The implementation of the new regulation "Supplementary Requirements for the Qualification Accreditation of Environmental Monitoring Institutions (2025)" aims to enhance the quality of ecological environment monitoring data and sets stringent requirements for the monitoring industry [1] Group 1: New Regulation Requirements - The new regulation mandates that monitoring institutions should generally have no fewer than 20 personnel and raises standards for professional capabilities [1] - The optimization and adjustment of district-level monitoring institutions is identified as a critical task to meet the new requirements [1] Group 2: Challenges Faced - Personnel shortages in some district-level ecological environment monitoring stations hinder their ability to meet the new 20-person threshold, revealing a significant shortfall [2] - Specific examples include a monitoring station with a staffing of 14 out of a 16-person allocation and another with only 8 out of a 10-person allocation [1][2] Group 3: Implications of Personnel Shortages - Personnel shortages may lead to three main issues: 1. Impaired fulfillment of legal functions, affecting monitoring frequency and coverage [2] 2. Limited technical capability due to small personnel size and lack of diverse expertise [2] 3. Increased risk to data quality, as overworked staff may compromise the integrity of data collection [2] Group 4: Recommendations for Improvement - Accelerating the optimization of ecological environment monitoring institutions is essential to enhance governance capabilities and meet the demands of precise pollution control [2] - Encouraging regional integration of monitoring resources to form comprehensive environmental monitoring centers can improve efficiency and effectiveness [3] - Strengthening city-level coordination and establishing collaborative mechanisms are recommended to ensure data quality and allow district stations to focus on routine tasks [3] Group 5: Support and Sustainability - The success of the new regulation requires adequate support, including scientifically determining personnel allocations and ensuring stable financial input for laboratory construction and equipment updates [4] - Establishing a systematic training and assessment framework is crucial for continuous improvement of personnel capabilities [4] - The implementation of the new regulation presents both challenges and opportunities for restructuring and upgrading the grassroots monitoring system [4]