Group 1 - The article emphasizes the distinction between "real money" and "fake money" in capital markets, where "real money" represents actual wealth generated by companies, while "fake money" refers to fluctuating market prices that do not reflect true asset value [1][2][3] - It illustrates that a company's net assets, profits, and dividends are considered "real money," while the market's quoted prices for stocks are seen as "fake money" due to their volatility and lack of basis in actual wealth [2][3][6] - The focus on "fake money" leads many investors to overlook the importance of understanding the underlying financial metrics of their investments, such as net assets and profits [2][3][4] Group 2 - The article suggests that by shifting focus from "fake money" to "real money," investors can find investing easier and less emotionally taxing, as market price fluctuations do not affect the actual financial performance of their holdings [6][7] - It highlights that "real money" tends to increase over time, as evidenced by companies releasing financial reports that reflect genuine wealth growth, which is often ignored by investors fixated on market prices [8] - The narrative draws a parallel between the immediate gratification sought by some investors and the long-term benefits of focusing on "real money," suggesting that wise investors should prioritize sustainable value over transient market prices [8]