Group 1 - The article argues that the perception of consumers being "stingy" is misguided, as their spending behavior is driven by survival needs rather than a lack of funds [1][3] - It highlights the concept of "survival consumption," where individuals are forced to make financial decisions based on essential needs due to rising living costs, such as housing and education [3][5] - The article draws parallels between historical labor conditions and current economic challenges, suggesting that modern workers face similar constraints as "wage slaves" of the past [4][5] Group 2 - The article discusses the impact of low wages on consumer spending, noting that many workers earn just enough to survive, which limits their ability to purchase goods they produce [5][6] - It emphasizes the need for wage increases to match economic growth, arguing that higher wages would enable workers to buy products, thus stimulating the economy [7] - The article suggests that social security systems should be strengthened to provide a safety net for workers, encouraging them to spend rather than save out of fear [7][8] Group 3 - The article critiques the current economic model, stating that the focus on exports and investments often neglects consumer spending, which is essential for a balanced economy [6][7] - It calls for regulatory measures to prevent monopolistic practices and ensure fair competition, which would benefit small businesses and improve workers' bargaining power [7] - The conclusion stresses that economic success should be measured by the well-being of workers and their ability to enjoy the fruits of their labor, rather than just GDP figures [8]