Workflow
科研造假与管理乱象
icon
Search documents
新华时评·一线评论|求真的象牙塔容不下“学术南郭”
Xin Hua Wang· 2025-11-25 08:06
Core Viewpoint - The incident involving the former "chief scientist" Guo at Jiangsu University highlights significant issues of academic integrity and the need for rigorous verification processes in academic institutions [1][2][3] Group 1: Academic Integrity - The investigation revealed serious academic misconduct by Guo, leading to the termination of his employment agreement [1] - The case raises questions about how individuals with questionable credentials can attain high-ranking positions such as "chief scientist" [2] - The university acknowledged shortcomings in the verification process during Guo's recruitment and pledged to hold accountable those responsible [2] Group 2: Recruitment Practices - Many universities have implemented various talent recruitment programs with attractive conditions, but some have deviated from assessing true capabilities by focusing on superficial metrics like titles and publications [3] - There is a call for more rigorous processes to identify and eliminate individuals who do not possess genuine academic qualifications [3] - A healthy research ecosystem is essential for fostering innovation, emphasizing the importance of truthfulness in scientific inquiry [3]