Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the breakthrough of the Chinese brand HiPapa in sunscreen technology, which has been recognized by the prestigious journal Nano-Micro Letters with an impact factor of 36.3, marking a significant advancement in the field of sunscreen over the past two decades [3][27][29]. Group 1: Breakthrough Technology - HiPapa's innovative sunscreen technology utilizes mobile phone materials, potentially redefining the sunscreen industry [4][20]. - The research addresses long-standing issues in traditional sunscreen technology, which has struggled to balance protection, safety, and skin feel [10][11]. - The new two-dimensional titanium dioxide (2D TiO₂) structure allows for effective UV protection while minimizing skin penetration and reducing the generation of harmful free radicals [19][17]. Group 2: Industry Context - Traditional sunscreen technologies, dominated by Western standards, have not adequately resolved the "protection, safety, and skin feel" triangle, forcing consumers to compromise [10][11]. - The breakthrough technology from HiPapa is seen as a solution to these long-standing challenges, offering a new direction for global sunscreen research and development [23][29]. Group 3: Academic Recognition - The publication of HiPapa's research in Nano-Micro Letters signifies a major academic endorsement, establishing the credibility of Chinese sunscreen technology on a global scale [27][28]. - The journal is recognized as a leading publication in materials science, further validating the significance of HiPapa's findings [28]. Group 4: Market Strategy - HiPapa has secured 29 special certifications for its sunscreen products, ensuring compliance with rigorous efficacy and safety tests [31]. - The company is actively involved in establishing industry standards, having proposed eight beauty group standards to address gaps in the market [31][32]. - HiPapa's approach combines academic advantages with practical market applications, aiming to build a comprehensive authority in the sunscreen sector [32]. Group 5: Research Ecosystem - HiPapa has developed a "SCIENCE-LED" research and development system that integrates scientific theory, cutting-edge research, and strict validation processes [35][36]. - Collaborations with top research institutions enhance the company's innovation capabilities, ensuring the scientific validity and market applicability of its products [37]. - The focus on cross-industry technology transfer, particularly from mobile technology to skincare, exemplifies a strategic shift in product development [38][39].

■李侠 胡一 人在什么状况下创造力最好？每个人都有状态最好的时刻，回到日常生活最基本的需求层面，具有共性 的时刻是睡了一个好觉，感觉精力充沛，大脑动力强劲，思如泉涌。此刻应该就是一个人创造力最佳的 时刻。 有科学研究显示，大脑在睡眠状态下会修剪白天清醒时形成的神经突触，重新连接神经回路，使大脑不 至于过度拥挤。在此过程中，睡眠减少作为一个负面因素出现，将制约创新过程中第一步和第二步的循 环，从而最终影响想法完成。 来源：中国科学报 这个想法有根据吗？恰好近日学术期刊《研究政策》2025年第三期发表的一篇文章《员工睡眠与企业创 新》验证了笔者的猜想——睡眠有助于创新。 该文的两位作者来自美国南卡罗来纳大学。文章以扎实的证据表明，员工、工程师和科学家睡眠不足与 企业专利产出下降有关，尤其对于新颖性、突破性专利而言，产出下降更为明显。员工睡眠减少还与高 研发导向型企业的全要素生产率下降有关。研究表明，劳动力平均睡眠时间下降约半小时，会显著影响 公司的专利产出。后续测试表明，这种影响对创造性、不稳定的专利更为明显。此外，睡眠不足对生产 力的负面影响在专注于研究和创新的公司中最为显著。这与睡眠不足对复杂和具有创造性任务 ...

Group 1 - The core issue highlighted is the prevalence of academic misconduct, exemplified by a recent absurd paper published by a nurse from Shandong University Qilu Hospital, which incorrectly reported uterine fibroids in male patients [1] - The article discusses the negative impact of such bizarre papers on fair competition, academic integrity, and scientific progress, emphasizing that despite efforts to combat academic fraud, some issues remain persistent and increasingly covert [1][2] - New forms of academic fraud are emerging, including the use of photo editing to fabricate data, plagiarism, and the rise of "paper mills" that produce large volumes of similar research outputs, undermining the quality of academic work [1][2] Group 2 - The article points out that the root causes of academic misconduct include a narrow evaluation system that ties publication to career advancement, leading to a culture of impatience and superficiality in research [2] - It suggests that to foster a fair and innovative research environment, there should be a shift towards a more diversified evaluation system that values practical skills, especially for roles like nursing [2] - Recommendations include implementing dynamic supervision, establishing an industry blacklist to prevent favoritism in academic publishing, and clarifying definitions of academic misconduct to enhance accountability [2] Group 3 - The importance of research integrity is emphasized as the lifeblood of academia, with a call for a culture that values genuine scholarship over superficial achievements [3] - A balanced evaluation system is necessary to create a positive academic atmosphere that supports innovation and integrity [3]