Workflow
维护地区和平
icon
Search documents
柬泰签署停火联合声明,外交部:中方愿为柬泰双方开展更全面、具体沟通继续提供平台、创造条件
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-12-27 16:36
Core Viewpoint - The signing of a ceasefire joint statement between Cambodia and Thailand indicates that dialogue and negotiation are effective ways to resolve complex disputes, with support from China, ASEAN, and the international community [2] Group 1: Ceasefire Agreement - Cambodia and Thailand signed a ceasefire joint statement during a special meeting of the Border Committee (GBC) on December 27 [2] - The joint statement reflects a commitment to dialogue and cooperation in addressing border disputes [2] Group 2: China's Role - China welcomes the ceasefire agreement and expresses willingness to provide a platform for further communication between Cambodia and Thailand [2] - Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi is scheduled to meet with Cambodian and Thai officials on December 28-29 to discuss the situation [2] - China aims to play a constructive role in consolidating the ceasefire, restoring communication, rebuilding political trust, and maintaining regional peace [2]
不结盟运动协调局呼吁维护拉美和加勒比地区和平
Yang Shi Xin Wen· 2025-09-20 22:45
Core Points - The Non-Aligned Movement Coordinating Bureau expressed deep concern and worry regarding the presence of external military forces in Latin America and the Caribbean [1] - The Bureau supports the stance of member countries of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) against this military presence and calls for adherence to the Treaty of Tlatelolco to maintain the region as a zone of peace and a nuclear-free area [1] Group 1 - The Bureau reaffirms the right of the peoples of Latin America and the Caribbean to self-determination without external interference [1] - It commits to resolving disputes through peaceful means to eliminate the use or threat of force in the region [1] - The Bureau emphasizes the principles of national sovereignty, territorial integrity, and non-interference in domestic or foreign affairs [1] Group 2 - The Bureau warns against using aggressive rhetoric, hostile actions, and military threats as tools of foreign policy, particularly in a region committed to diplomacy, peace, and nuclear disarmament [1]