Overview - The survey conducted by the China Center for Information Industry Development and the Anhui Ance Think Tank covers government websites at various levels from national ministries to local governments, with data collection from October 15 to November 30, 2025 [1][24]. Survey Results - The overall performance shows a "partially bright, overall uneven" trend, with significant differences in indicator scores. The best performance was in policy interpretation (average score of 86.00%), while the weakest areas were in specialized columns (38.53%) and proactive disclosure item directories (30.31%) [2]. - National ministries performed well overall, but there were weaknesses in punitive enforcement and proactive disclosure item directories. Provincial governments excelled in policy interpretation and basic information disclosure but lacked in major decision pre-disclosure and public disclosure in the livelihood sector [2][39]. - City and county governments showed significant achievements in policy interpretation, with county governments achieving a score of 97.33%, but had notable shortcomings in specialized columns and policy file management [2][56]. Achievements - Over 95% of units have established relevant columns for planning and information disclosure, with content including texts, interpretations, and historical information, demonstrating strong systematic and continuous disclosure [3]. - Fiscal transparency has steadily improved, with all levels of government achieving over 75% in fiscal budget disclosure, and regular disclosure of "three public" expenses and performance information [4]. - Timely public disclosure of personnel recruitment information has been achieved, with over 90% of units setting up dedicated columns and integrating some functions of government services [5]. - Initial success in pre-disclosure of major decisions has been noted, with city and county levels achieving scores over 60%, often using a combination of online and offline methods to solicit opinions [6]. - The policy interpretation mechanism is gradually being implemented, with provincial, city, and county levels achieving scores over 80%, utilizing diverse formats such as infographics and short videos [7]. Core Issues - Insufficient disclosure in key livelihood areas such as safety production, food and drug safety, education, and housing security, with average scores below 60% [8]. - Over 70% of units have not disclosed proactive disclosure item directories, and those that have often face issues with timely updates and lack of standardization [9]. - The construction of policy file libraries is inadequate, with some units lacking dedicated libraries and inconsistent standards for file inclusion [10]. - The quality of specialized column construction is uneven, with less than 60% of grassroots governments having established them, and many columns lacking maintenance [11]. - Search functionality optimization is insufficient, with issues such as "searchable within the site but not visible" and low accuracy in retrieval [12]. Outlook and Recommendations - Focus on public disclosure in livelihood areas by integrating information based on high-frequency scenarios such as education and medical services, and establishing feedback mechanisms for the public [13]. - Optimize directory management by formulating national-level compilation standards and establishing dynamic update mechanisms [14]. - Upgrade policy file libraries to enhance comprehensive file management and improve intelligent search and Q&A functionalities [15]. - Improve the quality of specialized columns by establishing unique columns based on demand and optimizing information presentation and interactive services [16]. - Promote digital transformation by optimizing website architecture and intelligent search centered on users, deepening digital policy interpretation, and building a new media matrix [17].