马年伊始，上海市委副书记、市长龚正今天（2月25日）来到闵行区、徐汇区，走访服务重点企业，实 地了解企业经营发展情况，并与企业负责人座谈交流，听取意见建议，开展现场办公。龚正指出，要深 入贯彻落实习近平总书记考察上海重要讲话精神，按照市委部署，加强重点企业走访服务，主动上门送 政策、送服务、送关怀，让创新举措惠及各类经营主体，千方百计为企业排忧解难，持续打造一流营商 环境，为企业扎根上海、做大做强提供有力支撑。 （本文图片 张春海 摄） 上午，龚正一行来到中国航发商用航空发动机有限责任公司，详细了解长江系列发动机研发进展、模式 创新、队伍建设及未来规划，询问企业发展中有什么需要协调解决的问题。龚正说，中国航发商发肩负 着打造国家航空动力"中国心"的重大使命。希望加大自主创新力度，加强政产学研金服用协同创新，聚 力突破更多关键核心技术，努力成为航空发动机创新突破的策源地。希望发挥好"链主"企业作用，带动 航空发动机产业链上下游企业集聚，推进科研成果转化落地，共同构筑安全可靠的产业链供应链体系、 打造协同高效的产业生态，为实现高水平科技自立自强贡献更大力量。 在走访腾讯科技（上海）有限公司时，龚正说，实现"十五五 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the emergence of "campus confession walls" operated by students or external individuals, which serve as unofficial social accounts for emotional expression, information exchange, and life services. However, these platforms have also become breeding grounds for rumors and malicious behavior, casting a shadow over the carefree lives of children and raising concerns about protecting minors' mental well-being and growth spaces [1] Group 1 - The "campus confession walls" are non-official social media accounts that allow students to express emotions and share information [1] - These platforms, while initially intended for positive interactions, have been misused for spreading rumors and malicious content [1] - The issue highlights the need for protective measures to safeguard minors' mental health and ensure a healthy growth environment [1]

读者关切 我在上网获取信息、交流互动时，有时会遇到一些低俗、虚假信息。请问相关部门在治理网络空间乱 象、营造清朗网络环境方面有哪些政策法规和措施？ 网络空间是亿万民众共同的精神家园。网络空间天朗气清、生态良好，是广大网民的共同期待。 制定修订网络安全法、数据安全法、个人信息保护法，网络安全和数据安全基础制度不断建立健全。一 系列规章制度陆续出台，也对治理网络乱象进行了系统性规定：《人脸识别技术应用安全管理办法》施 行，有效应对"刷脸"乱象；《人工智能生成合成内容标识办法》实施，通过标识提醒用户辨别生成合成 信息，防范人工智能技术滥用……建章立制，管长治远，有效治理网络信息内容生态。 2025年11月28日，习近平总书记在主持中央政治局第二十三次集体学习时强调："要健全网络生态治理 长效机制，着力提升治理的前瞻性、精准性、系统性、协同性，持续营造风清气正的网络空间。" 营造风清气正的网络空间，要对网络乱象敢于亮剑、坚决打击，铲除其滋生的土壤和条件。 整治人工智能技术滥用、整治涉企网络"黑嘴"、整治恶意挑动负面情绪……近年来，中央网信办持续部 署开展"清朗"系列专项行动，集中时间、集中力量打击网上各类乱象问题，从 ...

Group 1 - The province has achieved significant results in cyberspace governance and positive energy construction, with a total internet user base of 4.25 million and an internet penetration rate of 72.6% [1] - The digital economy in the province has exceeded 114 billion yuan, indicating solid progress in high-quality development through information technology [1] - The province has actively cultivated positive online energy, with a total of 1.18 million related articles published and a cumulative reading volume of 5 billion times, fostering a consensus among netizens to love and build Qinghai [1] Group 2 - The province has implemented strict measures against online illegal activities, clearing 13,500 pieces of illegal information and handling over 2,410 cases of internet-related crimes in the past two years [1] - A classification management system for "self-media" accounts has been established, with over 2,400 accounts with more than 5,000 followers placed on a "red, gray, and black" list [1] - The province has created a favorable atmosphere for public participation in internet governance through the establishment of a network media association and initiatives like "Internet + Law" promotion [2] Group 3 - The province has a total of 26,600 5G base stations, achieving full coverage in towns and actively integrating into the national "East Data West Computing" layout [2] - Major companies such as Baidu, 360, and iFLYTEK have been attracted to establish operations in the province [2]

撰稿 / 流水（媒体人） 编辑 / 迟道华 校对 / 张彦君 近日，山寨"学信网"再现网络的消息引发舆论关注。 据智通财经报道，有不法分子制作山寨"学信网"，采用高仿域名，疑似从事骗取学信网用户登录账号密码和电子学历造假等违法行为。这并非此类乱象首 次出现，早在2004年教育部就曾发布公告，重申学信网是学历证书查询唯一网站，针对的就是不法分子利用"李鬼"网站，进行学历文凭造假、贩卖等非法 活动。 ▲山寨"学信网"注册域名仅比官方网站多了一个w字母，令人难以分辨。图/湖北经视直播 仿冒学信网，不仅涉嫌违法，也侵蚀着权威网站的公信力，伤害学子权益，扰乱网络空间秩序，亟待多方合力重拳整治，不能屡打不绝。 学信网是由教育部学生服务与素质发展中心主办的权威教育信息服务平台。作为教育部唯一指定的高等教育学历证书查询平台，其提供的学历查询、在线 验证、学历认证等信息系统服务，与求职者的职业发展、学子的升学深造息息相关，其权威性和公信力深入人心。 山寨"学信网"的反复出现，警示我们网络空间治理仍需持续发力，护好公众对权威信息的信任，才能维护健康有序的网络空间秩序。 撰稿 / 流水（媒体人） 编辑 / 迟道华 校对 / 张彦君 ...

Core Viewpoint - The newly revised "Public Security Administration Punishment Law" will take effect on January 1, 2026, addressing the dissemination of obscene information and correcting the misconception of "private domain immunity" in the digital age [1][3]. Group 1: Legal Framework - The new regulation establishes a tiered governance system that combines administrative oversight with strict criminal accountability, creating a comprehensive legal framework for regulating obscene information dissemination [2]. - Article 80 of the new regulation allows for penalties including detention of 10 to 15 days and fines up to 5,000 yuan for the dissemination of obscene content, regardless of whether it occurs in public groups or private chats [1][2]. Group 2: Responsibilities and Enforcement - The new regulation clarifies the responsibilities of network group managers, eliminating the assumption of "no responsibility" for managers, and emphasizes that harmful actions must bear legal consequences regardless of profit motives [3]. - The law stipulates harsher penalties for obscene materials involving minors, aligning with the principle of protecting minors as outlined in the Minor Protection Law [3]. Group 3: Implications for Digital Governance - The comprehensive coverage of dissemination scenarios in the new regulation provides a legal basis for addressing new forms of online obscene information spread, requiring platforms to extend content review to private domains [3]. - The revision of the law not only advances legal provisions but also reshapes social consensus in the digital age, emphasizing the need to delineate legal boundaries and enforce responsibilities to effectively curb the spread of obscene information [3].

Group 1 - The central theme of the article highlights the crackdown on various internet celebrities and accounts that have engaged in illegal and unethical behaviors, including inciting social division and promoting distorted values [1][12][27] - The account "Huchengfeng" has been identified for creating divisive labels such as "Android people" and "Apple people," which exacerbate social tensions and have led to the closure of related accounts across multiple platforms [4][5][6] - Other accounts, including "Guo Meimei," have been penalized for promoting materialistic and unhealthy values, showcasing luxury items to gain attention and monetize their influence [14][16] Group 2 - The article discusses the broader issue of "polluting the online environment," with specific examples of accounts that have disseminated inappropriate content, including promoting pornography and using vulgar language [19][21] - The regulatory response includes a series of actions aimed at addressing these online issues, with a focus on enhancing the responsibilities of platforms to manage content effectively [31][35] - The new cybersecurity law, set to take effect in January 2026, aims to strengthen oversight and accountability for online platforms, ensuring they take proactive measures against harmful content [32][33]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the recent crackdown by the Central Cyberspace Administration of China on various online influencers who have engaged in illegal activities, including inciting social division, promoting distorted values, and polluting the online environment. This action has drawn significant attention due to the involvement of several prominent internet personalities [1]. Group 1: Inciting Social Division - The account "Hu Chenfeng" has been reported for creating divisive narratives, labeling groups as "Android people" and "Apple people," which has led to heightened social tensions. This account has been banned across multiple platforms for violating regulations [2][4][7]. - Hu Chenfeng's rhetoric categorizes "Apple people" as the elite, characterized by owning iPhones and Teslas, while "Android people" are depicted as the lower class, using Android devices and shopping at local markets. This binary classification is seen as a deliberate attempt to provoke conflict between these groups [9][11]. Group 2: Promoting Distorted Values - Several accounts, including "Guo Mei May" and "Yi Yan LuLu," have been penalized for continuously promoting materialistic and hedonistic values. These accounts have been closed or suspended for their harmful content [16][18]. - Guo Mei May, after being released from prison, has attempted to regain attention by flaunting luxury items and promoting a lavish lifestyle, which has been deemed detrimental to societal values [20]. Group 3: Polluting the Online Environment - Accounts like "Lanxi" and "Zhang Xuefeng" have been penalized for disseminating inappropriate content, including promoting foreign pornographic films and using vulgar language during live streams. These accounts have faced bans and restrictions [22]. - Experts emphasize that online influencers bear a greater responsibility due to their significant reach and should adhere to societal norms and standards in their content [22]. Group 4: Issues of Account Rebirth - The article discusses the issue of problematic accounts attempting to "rebrand" themselves after being banned. For instance, accounts associated with tax evasion and promoting materialism have been found to re-register on platforms [24][26]. - Regulatory bodies are urging platforms to implement stricter checks to prevent the resurgence of such accounts, indicating a need for improved governance mechanisms [26][28]. Group 5: Ongoing Regulatory Actions - The Central Cyberspace Administration has been actively conducting the "Qinglang" series of operations to address various online misconducts, including malicious marketing and the spread of false information [30][32]. - The governance model is shifting towards a more comprehensive regulatory approach, emphasizing proactive measures and accountability for platforms in managing content [34][39].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of a legal framework based on constitutional principles to ensure a vibrant and orderly digital space, addressing issues like online fraud and data privacy [1][6] - The Constitution serves as the fundamental basis for governance in cyberspace, establishing core values and frameworks that guide digital rights and obligations [2][4] - Recent legislation, including personal information protection laws and cybersecurity laws, reflects the application of constitutional principles in the digital realm, providing clear legal foundations for governance [2][5] Group 2 - Innovative legal education efforts aim to integrate constitutional principles into everyday digital interactions, making legal concepts accessible and relevant to the public [3][4] - National initiatives, such as the "National Online Legal Education Campaign," leverage online platforms to enhance legal awareness and promote responsible internet usage among citizens [4][5] - The ultimate goal of legal education is to transform good laws into effective governance, ensuring that digital rights are protected and that the digital space is not lawless [5][6]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need for strict regulation of online influencers to maintain a healthy online environment and prevent the spread of negative emotions and misinformation [1][3] - Recent actions taken by the Central Cyberspace Administration include a two-month campaign to address issues such as inciting extreme group emotions and promoting panic, which reflects a zero-tolerance approach towards harmful online behavior [1][3] - The crackdown on influencers like "Hu Chenfeng," "Zhang Xuefeng," and "Wang Zibai" highlights the ongoing efforts to ensure that online platforms adhere to legal and ethical standards [1][3] Group 2 - The implementation of a comprehensive governance mechanism requires online platforms to take responsibility for content management, including measures like real-name registration for accounts with over 500,000 followers and risk warnings for published content [2] - Platforms are encouraged to enhance content review processes by combining human oversight with intelligent systems to prevent the publication of harmful content [2] - There is a call for platforms to support positive content creation by incentivizing quality contributions and limiting the reach of problematic accounts [2] Group 3 - The legal foundation for online governance has strengthened with the establishment of laws such as the Cybersecurity Law and regulations for the protection of minors online, providing a robust framework for ecological governance [3] - Continuous refinement of enforcement measures and standards is necessary to ensure clarity and operability in the legal framework governing online behavior [3] - The ongoing "Qinglang Action" signifies the commitment of regulatory bodies to purify the online space, reinforcing the principle that the internet is not a lawless domain [3]