Core Viewpoint - The rise of online rights protection has provided a platform for marginalized voices, but it has also led to the phenomenon of "online chaos," where emotional manipulation and public pressure can distort the original intent of advocacy [1][4]. Group 1: Online Rights Protection and Its Challenges - Online rights protection has the potential to promote social justice, but it is often undermined by "online chaos," where louder voices are perceived as more legitimate [1][4]. - The manipulation of emotions and sensationalism in online discourse can lead to a distortion of facts, making it difficult for rational discussions to take place [2][4]. - The phenomenon of "anger baiting" has emerged, where extreme expressions and misleading narratives attract more attention than rational arguments [1][2]. Group 2: Governance and Response to Online Chaos - The root of online chaos lies in unresolved issues offline, leading individuals to seek resolution through online platforms [3]. - Some local governance bodies may choose to avoid confrontation with public opinion, opting for temporary solutions that can undermine long-term trust in legal processes [3][5]. - The approach of resolving issues based on the level of public outcry can erode the credibility of rules and procedures, ultimately harming the rights of law-abiding citizens [4][5]. Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - To address online chaos, it is essential to establish formal channels for legal rights protection and effective mechanisms for dispute resolution, which can simplify processes and enhance response efficiency [5]. - Online platforms should take responsibility for monitoring and intervening against false information and malicious incitement, fostering a more responsible online environment [6]. - Encouraging rational participation and critical judgment among internet users can help mitigate the spread of unverified and emotionally charged information [6][7].