近日，抖音升级批量侵权举报工具，用户可在PC端网站通过粘贴链接、上传文件的形式，一键发起批量举报。其中，上传表格单次最多可提交2000条举报 内容，支持举报视频、图文、抖音账号资料等多个涉嫌侵权的场景。12月18日起，个人及企业用户均可通过抖音批量侵权举报网站使用该服务。 此外，面对成百上千条侵权举报内容，过往用户举报后需手动核对进度的问题也被解决，实时追踪处置进展是此次升级的最大亮点。抖音批量侵权举报支 持"历史记录" 查询，用户不仅可清晰查看PC端的举报记录，举报列表还会详细呈现侵权类型、举报描述、提交时间及当前处置进度等关键信息，可避免重 复举报或遗漏。 同时，平台还特别优化了 "举报详情"的明细追踪。用户点击"查看明细"进入该举报ID对应的详情页面，系统会根据"举报成功""举报失败""待补充材料""已 撤销""提交失败"的分类予以提示，方便用户掌握进展并及时提交对应材料。"举报失败"或"待补充材料"的投诉单，用户点击"进度"可查看具体原因，能有效 提升二次举报的成功率。 据悉，该平台还可智能识别excel表格模版内链接、App端的分享链接，用户可在网站追踪、查询批量投诉的处置进度，直击用户遭遇侵权时 ...

近日，抖音升级批量侵权举报工具，用户可在PC端网站通过粘贴链接、上传文件的形式，一键发起批 量举报。其中，上传表格单次最多可提交2000条举报内容，支持举报视频、图文、抖音账号资料等多个 涉嫌侵权的场景。12月18日起，个人及企业用户均可通过抖音批量侵权举报网站 （www.douyin.com/qinquan/report）使用该服务。 据悉，该平台还可智能识别excel表格模版内链接、App端的分享链接，用户可在网站追踪、查询批量投 诉的处置进度，直击用户遭遇侵权时 "举报难、删不完"的体验痛点。抖音相关负责人表示，为系统提 升用户维权效率、降低侵权举报成本，该批量举报工具覆盖了肖像权、隐私权、个人名誉权、企业商 誉、著作权等八大常见侵权场景，当用户面临激增的海量侵权内容时，能极大提升举报效率。 图：抖音PC端批量侵权举报工具使用指引 这一升级并非孤立举措，今年5月抖音已在App端推出"阻止相同侵权内容传播" 功能，在肖像权、隐私 权侵权情形下，支持用户基于App内的侵权举报成功通知申请触发平台主动治理，无需用户再对相同侵 权内容逐一举报，大幅降低重复侵权举报成本。本次批量侵权举报工具的升级，则进一步降低用 ...

Core Viewpoint - The rise of short video platforms has led to an increase in individuals using these platforms for rights protection, but there is a fine line between legitimate claims and defamation, as illustrated by a recent court case involving a defamation dispute stemming from a short video posted on Douyin [1][2]. Case Summary - In May 2024, an individual named Zhang was entrusted by Li to handle certain matters for a fee of 30,000 yuan, but after Li terminated the contract, Zhang only refunded 20,000 yuan. Li then posted a video on Douyin accusing Zhang of being a fraud, which garnered significant attention with nearly 400 shares, over 700 comments, and more than 2,000 likes [2]. - Zhang claimed that Li's video severely damaged his reputation and filed a lawsuit for defamation, seeking compensation for the harm caused [2]. Court Ruling - The court determined that Li's video constituted a negative evaluation of Zhang, and Li failed to provide evidence to support the truthfulness of his claims. The court found that Li's actions resulted in a significant reduction in Zhang's social standing, establishing a clear causal link between Li's defamatory statements and the damage to Zhang's reputation [3]. - Although Li deleted the video before the court hearing, the court ruled that he must publicly apologize to Zhang on Douyin, aligning the scope of the apology with the extent of the infringement [3]. Legal Implications - The case highlights the legal boundaries of free speech in the context of online platforms, emphasizing that while individuals have the right to express their opinions, they must not infringe upon the legitimate rights of others, particularly regarding defamation [4]. - The court's decision reinforces the notion that online statements must be truthful and lawful, as failure to adhere to these standards can lead to legal repercussions, including the obligation to cease infringement and restore the injured party's reputation [4][5]. Recommendations for Individuals - Individuals facing online defamation should preserve evidence such as screenshots, links, and comments to support their claims [7]. - They should utilize reporting mechanisms on social media platforms to request the removal of infringing content and seek assistance in identifying the infringer [7]. - In cases of serious defamation, individuals are advised to report to law enforcement and consider filing civil lawsuits to seek damages and public apologies [8][9].

Core Points - The "Private Economy Promotion Law" officially implemented on May 20 aims to create a comprehensive support network for the private economy, covering fair competition, investment promotion, technological innovation, service assurance, and rights protection [1] - The law emphasizes the protection of the personal rights and reputation of private economic organizations and their operators, addressing long-standing concerns about the public opinion environment for private enterprises [1] - The private economy significantly contributes to the economy, accounting for over 50% of tax revenue, 60% of GDP, 70% of technological innovations, 80% of urban employment, and 90% of market entities [1] Group 1 - The law provides a strong response to the negative public perception of private enterprises, aiming to stabilize confidence and stimulate vitality within the sector [1] - There has been a long-standing unfair treatment of private enterprises in public discourse, leading to reputational damage and interference with normal business operations [2] - Recent government actions have targeted online harassment and misinformation against private enterprises, aiming to create a better environment for their development [2] Group 2 - The case of internet influencer Ai Fen and Aier Eye Hospital highlights the complexities of online reputation management and the consequences of spreading misinformation [3] - The recent banning of Ai Fen and her associated accounts underscores that the internet is not a lawless space, and online advocacy must adhere to legal standards [3] - There is a need for society to foster a positive public opinion environment for private enterprises and to strictly combat illegal online defamation [4] Group 3 - While the "Private Economy Promotion Law" does not grant private enterprises immunity from scrutiny, all oversight must occur within legal frameworks to ensure fairness and justice [5]