Group 1: Core Perspectives - The meeting between President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu highlighted a shared short-term victory over Iran's nuclear program, but underlying strategic differences remain evident [2][3] - Trump emphasizes a diplomatic approach to ensure Iran does not develop nuclear weapons, while Netanyahu advocates for more aggressive military actions to force Iran into significant concessions [3][4] Group 2: Divergence on Gaza Situation - Trump is pushing for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, aiming to present himself as a global peace broker, while Netanyahu is focused on completely dismantling Hamas, which complicates the peace process [4][5] - The gap between short-term ceasefire and long-term solutions remains significant, with Netanyahu expressing dissatisfaction over U.S. plans to restart nuclear negotiations with Iran [4][5] Group 3: Strategies and Alternatives - Netanyahu seeks a "Libya model" for Iran, demanding complete dismantlement of nuclear facilities under strict supervision, contrasting with Trump's desire for a diplomatic breakthrough [5][6] - Israel's backup plan involves ongoing military actions to prevent the resurgence of Iran's nuclear program, while the U.S. adopts a hedging strategy, balancing between military action and diplomatic engagement [6][7] Group 4: Unfinished Business - The narrative of Iran's nuclear program being destroyed is seen as a warning from Trump to avoid further demands, indicating a reluctance to deepen U.S. involvement [7] - Despite military setbacks for Iran, the potential for rebuilding its capabilities remains, suggesting that Netanyahu's objectives regarding Iran are far from complete [7]