美国利用‘台独’
Search documents
台海观澜 | 一边是《沉默的荣耀》,一边是以武谋“独”的喧嚣
Jing Ji Guan Cha Bao· 2025-10-13 05:27
Core Viewpoint - The article contrasts the emotional impact of the TV series "Silent Glory," which depicts historical events related to Taiwan, with the current militaristic rhetoric from Taiwan's leadership, highlighting the tension between historical remembrance and contemporary political maneuvers [1][4]. Group 1: Impact of "Silent Glory" - The series has led to a significant number of viewers publicly declaring they will stop watching due to the painful historical context, particularly the tragic fates of characters like General Wu Shi and others [2]. - Many netizens have visited the tomb of General Wu Shi and his wife at Futian Cemetery to pay their respects, indicating a resurgence of interest in historical figures and events [3]. Group 2: Taiwan's Militaristic Rhetoric - Taiwan's leadership, particularly Lai Ching-te, has announced plans to develop a defense system akin to Israel's Iron Dome and significantly increase defense spending, projecting a budget that will exceed 3% of GDP by 2026 and reach 5% by 2030 [4]. - A forum titled "Taipei Security Dialogue" was held to discuss Taiwan's military responses to potential actions from the mainland, featuring international experts and former officials [4]. Group 3: Political Context and External Influences - The article suggests that the current Taiwanese administration is deeply entrenched in a pro-independence stance, with many citizens influenced by this narrative, leaving little room for a shift in perspective [5]. - It discusses a shift in U.S. strategy regarding Taiwan, moving from controlling pro-independence sentiments to leveraging them to exacerbate tensions between the two sides, as evidenced by historical interactions and policy changes [6][7]. Group 4: Historical Reflection - The article reflects on the sacrifices made by figures like Wu Shi, emphasizing that unresolved historical wounds will persist as long as Taiwan remains separate from the mainland [9]. - It posits that while the mainland has the military capability to address the Taiwan issue, a strategic approach is favored, aiming for a resolution that considers historical responsibilities and minimizes costs [9].