Workflow
美国宏观经济调控
icon
Search documents
美罢免劳工统计局长后 首个重要数据再遭质疑:样本缺失、数据缩水、人员短缺 7月CPI还能信吗?
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-08-12 16:14
Core Viewpoint - The U.S. July CPI data revealed a year-on-year increase of 2.7%, lower than the expected 2.8%, while the core CPI rose by 3.1%, exceeding the forecast of 3%. This data is crucial as it may influence the Federal Reserve's interest rate decisions and has led to increased bets on a rate cut in September, causing a drop in the dollar and a rise in U.S. stocks [1] Data Collection Challenges - The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has reduced its sampling range for CPI data collection, halting price collection in cities like Lincoln, Nebraska, and Provo, Utah, and pausing collection in Buffalo, New York. Approximately 15% of price samples in other areas have also been temporarily suspended [2][5] - These adjustments have impacted the survey of goods and services prices, as well as housing rent surveys, leading to a decrease in the number of items used to calculate CPI. BLS claims that the overall inflation rate should remain stable, but volatility in the price index may increase in the affected areas [5] Internal Issues at BLS - BLS faces dual pressures from personnel shortages and budget cuts, with a significant hiring freeze and a proposed 8% budget reduction for the 2026 fiscal year. This has resulted in a 15% staff loss since the beginning of the year, limiting data collection capabilities [7][8] - The disbandment of advisory committees has further complicated BLS operations, leading to concerns about the reliability of government economic data due to reduced staffing and resources [8] Data Reliability Concerns - The reliance on imputation methods to fill data gaps has increased, with a notable rise in the use of "different unit" imputation, which is less accurate. This indicates a decline in the coverage and quality of CPI data, raising questions about its reliability [10][12] - Historical simulations by BLS suggest that the impact of reduced sampling on national inflation rates may be minimal, but localized data reliability could be compromised, leading to increased volatility in specific indices [12][13] Implications of Data Credibility - The credibility of CPI data is critical for monetary policy, as the Federal Reserve relies on it to assess inflation and make interest rate decisions. Inaccurate CPI data could mislead the Fed regarding inflation pressures [17] - The implications extend to various federal welfare programs and financial instruments, indicating that compromised data quality could affect economic decision-making at multiple levels [17][18]