Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the backlash against the United States during the Milan Winter Olympics, particularly directed at the ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) agency, following the recent killings of two innocent citizens by its officers, which has sparked global outrage and protests against American law enforcement practices [1][3][12]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The article details two tragic incidents involving ICE, where both victims, Renee Good and Alex Preti, were killed by officers under questionable circumstances, raising serious concerns about the agency's use of force [5][7]. - Public opinion polls indicate that a significant portion of the American population views ICE's actions as excessive, with 60% believing in excessive enforcement and 56% deeming the use of force in these incidents as inappropriate [7]. Group 2: International Response - The presence of ICE personnel at the Olympics has been met with widespread criticism, with Italian officials and citizens expressing their disapproval, viewing it as a violation of Italy's sovereignty and safety standards [9][18]. - Protests erupted in Milan, with demonstrators calling for the removal of ICE from the event, reflecting a broader discontent with American policies and actions abroad [16][20]. Group 3: Implications for US-EU Relations - The backlash against the US during the Olympics underscores a growing rift between the US and Europe regarding law enforcement philosophies and respect for national sovereignty [18][20]. - The article suggests that the incidents and subsequent protests may signify a turning point in US-EU relations, as European nations increasingly resist American dominance and assert their own standards for law enforcement [20][22].

当地时间8月18日，美国总统特朗普在白宫与乌克兰总统泽连斯基举行双边会晤，随后与泽连斯基以及 多名欧洲领导人举行多方会晤。这是继半年前白宫"世纪争吵"后，泽连斯基再访白宫。这一次，泽连斯 基放软身段，甚至一改平日"军装风"。虽然依旧没穿西装系领带，但一身黑色衬衫和夹克，显得更为正 式。 在白宫举行的多场会晤聚焦安全保障、领土问题、停火协议等议题，尽管欧洲各国领导人"陪同"，会晤 气氛较此前有所缓和，但国际舆论普遍认为会晤进展有限，核心问题都尚未落地。对此，复旦大学国际 问题研究院中欧关系研究中心主任简军波向南都N视频记者分析，"若此次谈判能取得实质性进展，确 实有助于推动乌克兰危机化解。但前提是欧洲停止煽动对立，同时乌克兰方面接受相关安排。最终结果 如何，仍需持续观察各方后续动向。" 复旦大学经济学院世界经济研究所教授丁纯也曾向南都记者表示，"2月的白宫争吵，泽连斯基看似冲 动，实际结果是通过争吵争取时间和空间，让欧洲国家直接加入了本是美俄对谈、撇开欧乌的局，一定 程度让特朗普的原计划碰了个钉子。" 丁纯认为，欧洲既会继续支持乌克兰，又会力劝乌克兰不与美国闹翻。由于特朗普的战略转向将欧洲和 乌克兰边缘化，欧洲 ...

Group 1 - The meeting on August 18 at the White House involved leaders from the US, Europe, and Ukraine, with a focus on cooperation and coordination regarding the Ukraine crisis [3][5][10] - The atmosphere was generally positive, with a notable contrast in expressions among leaders, indicating underlying tensions and differing priorities between the US and European leaders [8][9][13] - Trump's approach during the meeting highlighted a shift in US policy, emphasizing direct negotiations without preconditions for ceasefire, which raised concerns among European leaders about their interests being safeguarded [10][13] Group 2 - The meeting included a significant moment where Trump spoke with Russian President Putin, effectively turning the US-EU-Ukraine meeting into a four-party discussion, which may lead to increased interaction on security issues [5][15] - European leaders expressed urgency in addressing the Ukraine crisis, viewing it as critical to European security, and sought to reinforce their influence with Trump [13][15] - The possibility of a future meeting between the Russian and Ukrainian presidents was mentioned, with Russia maintaining a flexible stance on negotiations, indicating that while challenges exist, dialogue remains a possibility [14][15]