表决程序

Search documents
盘古智能: 北京市环球律师事务所上海分所关于青岛盘古智能制造股份有限公司2025年第一次临时股东大会的见证法律意见书
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-07-24 16:20
的 见证法律意见书 北京市环球律师事务所上海分所 关于青岛盘古智能制造股份有限公司 GLO2025SH(法)字第 07122 号 北京市环球律师事务所上海分所 关于 青岛盘古智能制造股份有限公司 (以 下称"《公司法》")、 《中华人民共和国证券法》 (以下称"《证券法》")、中 国证券监督管理委员会(以下称"中国证监会")发布的《上市公司股东会规则》 (以下称"《股东会规则》")及《青岛盘古智能制造股份有限公司章程》(以 下称"《公司章程》")的有关规定,就公司于 2025 年 7 月 24 日召开的 2025 年第一次临时股东大会(以下称"本次股东大会")的有关事宜,出具本法律意 见书。 为了出具本法律意见书,本所律师列席了公司本次股东大会并审查了公司提 供的有关公司召开本次股东大会的文件。 本法律意见书仅供公司为本次股东大会之目的而使用,不得被任何人用于其 他任何目的。本所在此同意,可以将本法律意见书作为公司本次股东大会的公告 材料,随其他需公告的信息一起向公众披露,并依法对本所在其中发表的法律意 见承担责任。 致:青岛盘古智能制造股份有限公司 北京市环球律师事务所上海分所(以下称"本所")接受青岛盘古 ...
湖南白银: 湖南启元律师事务所关于湖南白银股份有限公司2025年第一次临时股东大会的法律意见书
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-07-20 08:22
湖南启元律师事务所 关于湖南白银股份有限公司 湖南启元律师事务所(以下简称"本所")接受湖南白银股份有限公司(以 下简称"公司")的委托,指派本所律师出席了公司 2025 年第一次临时股东大 会(以下简称"本次股东大会"),对本次股东大会的召集和召开程序、出席会 议人员及召集人的资格、表决程序和表决结果的合法有效性进行现场律师见证, 并发表本法律意见。 本所律师根据《中华人民共和国公司法》(以下简称"《公司法》")、《中 华人民共和国证券法》(以下简称"《证券法》")、《上市公司股东会规则》 (以下简称"《股东会规则》")等我国现行法律、法规、规范性文件以及《湖 南白银股份有限公司章程》(以下简称"《公司章程》")的有关规定出具本法 律意见书。 本所律师声明如下: (一)本所律师根据本法律意见书出具日以前已经发生或者存在的事实,严 格履行了法定职责,遵循了勤勉尽责和诚实信用原则,进行了充分的核查验证, 保证本法律意见所认定的事实真实、准确、完整,所发表的结论性意见合法、准 确,不存在虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏,并承担相应法律责任。 (二)本所律师出具本法律意见是基于公司已承诺所有提供给本所律师的文 件的 ...
华生科技: 浙江天册律师事务所关于浙江华生科技2025年第三次临时股东大会法律意见书
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-07-18 09:07
法律意见书 浙江天册律师事务所 关于 浙江省杭州市杭大路 1 号黄龙世纪广场 A 座 11 楼 310007 电话:0571-87901111 传真:0571-87901500 法律意见书 浙江天册律师事务所 关于 浙江华生科技股份有限公司 法律意见书 编号:TCYJS2025H1204 致:浙江华生科技股份有限公司 浙江天册律师事务所(以下简称"本所")接受浙江华生科技股份有限公司 (以下简称"华生科技"或"公司")的委托,指派本所律师王骁驰、赵航参加 公司 2025 年第三次临时股东大会,并根据《中华人民共和国公司法》(以下简称 "《公司法》")、《中华人民共和国证券法》(以下简称"《证券法》")等 法律、法规和其他有关规范性文件的要求及《浙江华生科技股份有限公司章程》 (下称"《公司章程》")《浙江华生科技股份有限公司股东大会议事规则》(下称 "《议事规则》")的规定出具本法律意见书。 在本法律意见书中,本所律师仅对本次股东大会召集、召开程序、出席人员 的资格、召集人的资格、表决程序及表决结果的合法有效性发表意见,不对会议 所审议的议案内容和该等议案中所表述的事实或数据的真实性和准确性发表意见。 浙江华 ...
苏豪弘业: 国浩律师(南京)事务所关于苏豪弘业股份有限公司2025年第一次临时股东大会的法律意见书
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-07-10 16:22
Core Viewpoint - The legal opinion confirms that the procedures for convening and holding the extraordinary general meeting of Suhao Hongye Co., Ltd. are in compliance with relevant laws and regulations, ensuring the legitimacy and validity of the meeting [3][10]. Group 1: Meeting Procedures - The extraordinary general meeting was convened by the 38th meeting of the 10th Board of Directors on June 20, 2025, and the notice was issued on June 21, 2025, in accordance with legal requirements [4][5]. - The meeting was conducted using a combination of on-site and online voting, with the on-site meeting held on July 10, 2025, at a specified location [5][9]. - The notice included details such as meeting time, location, voting methods, and registration procedures, which comply with the relevant laws and company regulations [4][5]. Group 2: Qualifications of Participants - The meeting was convened by the Board of Directors, and the qualifications of the attendees were verified, confirming that 174 shareholders participated, representing 69,919,359 voting shares, which is 28.3341% of the total voting shares [6][7]. - The presence of company directors, supervisors, and the company secretary was in accordance with the company’s articles of association [8]. Group 3: Voting Procedures and Results - The proposals for the meeting were put forward by the Board of Directors and were announced in advance, meeting the requirements for shareholder meetings [8][9]. - Voting was conducted through both on-site and online methods, with results being combined and verified, confirming that all proposals were approved without objection from the shareholders present [9][10]. - The voting procedures and results were found to be in compliance with the relevant laws and regulations, ensuring their legality and validity [9][10].
红四方: 安徽天禾律师事务所关于红四方2025年第二次临时股东会的法律意见书
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-07-10 11:12
Core Viewpoint - The legal opinion confirms that the procedures for the second extraordinary general meeting of shareholders held by Zhongyan Anhui Hongsifang Fertilizer Co., Ltd. on July 10, 2025, comply with relevant laws, regulations, and the company's articles of association [1][5]. Group 1: Meeting Procedures - The meeting was convened by the company's board of directors, with proper announcements made in various financial publications and on the company's designated information disclosure website [1]. - The meeting was held on July 10, 2025, with specific voting times set for both on-site and online participation [2]. Group 2: Attendance and Voting - A total of 288 participants attended the meeting, representing 196,057,363 valid voting shares, which is 75.4066% of the total voting shares [2][3]. - The voting process combined on-site and online methods, with results being monitored and recorded according to the company's articles of association [3][4]. Group 3: Voting Results - The meeting approved several resolutions, including the election of non-independent and independent directors, with approval rates exceeding 99.69% for most resolutions [4][5]. - The legal opinion asserts that the voting results are legitimate and valid, adhering to all legal and regulatory requirements [5].
万润股份: 上海市方达(北京)律师事务所关于中节能万润股份有限公司2025年第一次临时股东大会的法律意见书
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-07-02 16:27
Core Viewpoint - The legal opinion letter confirms that the procedures for convening and holding the 2025 first extraordinary general meeting of shareholders of China Energy Conservation and Environmental Protection Group Co., Ltd. comply with relevant Chinese laws and regulations as well as the company's articles of association [1][3][6]. Group 1: Meeting Procedures - The notice for the meeting was published on June 13, 2025, on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange website, meeting the requirement of more than 15 days' notice [3][4]. - The meeting utilized a combination of on-site and online voting, with specific time slots for online voting on July 2, 2025 [3][4]. Group 2: Voting Participation and Qualifications - A total of 9 shareholders participated in the on-site voting, representing 245,692,619 shares, which is 26.4194% of the total voting shares [4][5]. - The overall participation included 411 shareholders, representing 399,788,007 shares, or 42.9894% of the total voting shares [4][5]. Group 3: Voting Results - The proposal to elect non-independent directors received 398,988,657 votes in favor, accounting for 99.8001% of the votes cast [5][6]. - The voting results from minority investors showed 41,838,880 votes in favor, which is 98.1253% of the votes from minority shareholders [6]. Group 4: Conclusion - The legal opinion concludes that the meeting's convening, voting participation, and results are all in compliance with Chinese laws and the company's articles of association, confirming the legality and validity of the proceedings [6].
武汉控股: 湖北瑞通天元律师事务所关于武汉三镇实业控股股份有限公司2025年第二次临时股东大会的法律意见书
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-06-30 16:34
Core Viewpoint - The legal opinion letter from Hubei Ruitong Tianyuan Law Firm confirms the legality of the convening and conducting of the second extraordinary general meeting of shareholders of Wuhan San Zhen Industrial Holdings Co., Ltd. in 2025, ensuring compliance with relevant laws and regulations [1][2][3] Summary by Sections 1. Convening Procedure of the Shareholders' Meeting - The ninth board of directors of the company made a resolution to convene the shareholders' meeting, with the notice published on June 14, 2025, in various financial newspapers and on the Shanghai Stock Exchange's official website [2][3] 2. Holding of the Shareholders' Meeting - The shareholders' meeting was held on June 30, 2025, using a combination of on-site and online voting methods, with the actual time, location, and agenda consistent with the notice [3][4] 3. Qualifications of the Meeting Convenor and Attendees - The convenor of the meeting was the company's board of directors, which had the legal authority to convene the meeting. A total of 189 shareholders participated, representing 600,492,519 shares, accounting for 60.4483% of the total shares [4][5] 4. Online Voting Process - Shareholders could vote online through the Shanghai Stock Exchange's voting system, with specific time slots for voting. A total of 188 shareholders participated in online voting, representing 201,351,755 shares, or 20.2689% of the total shares [5][6] 5. Voting Procedures - The voting process combined both on-site and online votes, with results verified by shareholder representatives and the law firm. No temporary motions were introduced during the meeting [6][7] 6. Voting Results - The voting results for key resolutions included: - Proposal to cancel the supervisory board and amend the articles of association: 99.7957% in favor [6][7] - Proposal to establish rules for shareholder meetings: 99.8183% in favor [7] - Proposal to amend rules for board meetings: 99.8183% in favor [7] 7. Conclusion - The law firm concluded that the meeting's convening, participant qualifications, and voting results were all in compliance with the relevant laws and regulations, affirming the legality and validity of the proceedings [8]
雅博股份: 北京国枫(深圳)律师事务所关于山东雅博科技股份有限公司2024年度股东会的法律意见书
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-06-27 16:51
Core Viewpoint - The legal opinion issued by Beijing Guofeng (Shenzhen) Law Firm confirms the legality and validity of the procedures, qualifications, and voting results of the 2024 annual shareholders' meeting of Shandong Yabo Technology Co., Ltd. [1][12] Meeting Procedures - The meeting was convened by the company's sixth board of directors and publicly announced on June 7, 2025, detailing the time, location, and agenda [2][3]. - The meeting took place on June 27, 2025, combining on-site and online voting methods, with the on-site meeting held at the company's headquarters [3][4]. Attendance and Voting - A total of 284 participants, representing 693,905,918 shares, attended the meeting, accounting for 32.7182% of the total voting shares [4]. - The qualifications of attendees, including shareholders and proxies, were verified and deemed valid [4][12]. Voting Results - The meeting passed several key resolutions, including: - Approval of the 2024 Board of Directors' Work Report with 691,998,718 votes in favor, representing 99.7434% of the valid votes [5]. - Approval of the 2024 Supervisory Board's Work Report with 691,996,918 votes in favor, also representing 99.7434% [5]. - Approval of the 2024 Financial Settlement Report with 691,994,718 votes in favor, representing 99.7434% [6]. - Approval of the proposal not to distribute profits for 2024, with 691,689,918 votes in favor, representing 99.7041% [6]. - Approval of the expected related party transactions for 2025 with 194,218,182 votes in favor, representing 98.9885% of non-related shareholders [6]. - Approval of the proposal for the company and subsidiaries to apply for comprehensive credit limits with banks, receiving 194,188,682 votes in favor, representing 98.9735% of non-related shareholders [7]. Conclusion - The legal opinion concludes that the meeting's procedures, qualifications of attendees, and voting results comply with relevant laws and regulations, confirming their legality and validity [12].
中联重科: 上海市方达(北京)律师事务所 关于中联重科股份有限公司 2024 年年度股东大会的法律意见书
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-06-26 16:40
FANGDA PARTNERS http://www.fangdalaw.com 中国北京市朝阳区光华路 1 号 电子 邮件 E-mail: email@fangdalaw.com 北京嘉里中心北楼 27 层 电 话 Tel.: 86-10-5769-5600 邮政编码:100020 传 真 Fax: 86-10-5769-5788 Beijing 100020, PRC 上海市方达(北京)律师事务所 关于中联重科股份有限公司 致:中联重科股份有限公司 上海市方达(北京)律师事务所(以下简称"本所")是具有中华人民共和国 境内法律执业资格的律师事务所。根据相关法律顾问协议,本所指派律师出席中 联重科股份有限公司(以下简称"公司")2024 年年度股东大会(以下简称"本次 股东大会"),并就本次股东大会的召集和召开程序、参与表决和召集会议人员的 资格、表决程序和表决结果等有关事宜出具本法律意见书。 本法律意见书依据《中华人民共和国公司法》 《中华人民共和国证券法》 《上 市公司股东会规则》及其他相关中华人民共和国境内已公开颁布并生效的法律、 法规、规章及规范性文件(以下合称"中国法律法规",仅为本法律意见书说明 ...
东睦股份: 上海市锦天城律师事务所关于东睦新材料集团股份有限公司2025年第一次临时股东会法律意见书
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-06-23 16:54
上海市锦天城律师事务所 法律意见书 上海市锦天城律师事务所 关于东睦新材料集团股份有限公司 法律意见书 电话:021-20511000 传真:021-20511999 邮编:200120 上海市锦天城律师事务所 法律意见书 上海市锦天城律师事务所 关于东睦新材料集团股份有限公司 法律意见书 致:东睦新材料集团股份有限公司 上海市锦天城律师事务所(以下简称"本所")接受东睦新材料集团股份有 限公司(以下简称"公司")委托,就公司召开 2025 年第一次临时股东会(以 下简称"本次股东会")的有关事宜,根据《中华人民共和国公司法》(以下简 称"《公司法》")、《上市公司股东会规则》等法律、法规和其他规范性文件 以及《东睦新材料集团股份有限公司章程》(以下简称"《公司章程》")的有 关规定,出具本法律意见书。 为出具本法律意见书,本所及本所律师依据《律师事务所从事证券法律业务 管理办法》和《律师事务所证券法律业务执业规则(试行)》等规定,严格履行 了法定职责,遵循了勤勉尽责和诚实信用原则,对本次股东会所涉及的相关事项 进行了必要的核查和验证,审查了本所认为出具该法律意见书所需审查的相关文 件、资料,并参加了公司本次 ...