Core Viewpoint - The Chinese geometric precision instrument market is experiencing steady growth, driven by the demand for high-end manufacturing, smart manufacturing, and quality control, with a projected market size of 10.53 billion yuan by 2031, growing at a CAGR of 7.3% from 2025 to 2031 [2][6]. Market Overview - The market for geometric precision instruments in China is expected to reach 6.67 billion yuan in sales by 2024, with a total sales volume of 12,541 units, including 4,548 coordinate measuring machines and 1,594 laser interferometers [2][5]. - The market share of coordinate measuring machines is projected to increase from 36.27% in 2024 to 39.69% by 2031 [5]. Key Players - Major manufacturers in the domestic market include Hexagon, ZEISS, Mitutoyo, AMETEK, Nikon, Topcon, and others, with the top ten companies holding approximately 56.37% of the market share in 2024 [5][6]. Application Areas - The industrial machinery sector dominates the application of geometric precision instruments, with sales expected to grow from 3,989 units in 2024 to 4,992 units by 2031, reflecting a CAGR of 3.32% from 2025 to 2031 [5]. Market Drivers - The upgrade and precision demand in manufacturing are driving the rigid demand for geometric precision instruments, particularly in sectors like new energy vehicles and semiconductor manufacturing, which require high precision measurements [8]. - AI-driven intelligent detection technologies are enhancing measurement efficiency and accuracy, with systems achieving error rates as low as 0.05% [8]. - Policy support, such as the "Made in China 2025" initiative, is accelerating the development of domestic alternatives to imported equipment, with significant government funding allocated for research and development [9]. Market Challenges - The reliance on imported key components remains a significant challenge, as core components are dominated by foreign companies, leading to a technology gap in high-end applications [10]. - Material and process bottlenecks, such as restrictions on critical materials, hinder the development of domestic instruments [10]. - The lack of a comprehensive talent training system for interdisciplinary skills in optical design, mechanical precision processing, and software algorithms poses a challenge for the industry [11].