Core Viewpoint - The market regulatory authorities in China are intensifying efforts to combat consumer fraud related to measurement tools, particularly focusing on electronic scales and fuel dispensers, as part of the "Guarding Consumption" initiative in 2025 [14]. Group 1: Case Summaries - In Xiamen, a store was found selling electronic scales with cheating functions, leading to the seizure of 7 scales and a total value of over 130,000 yuan, with 11 related cases investigated [2]. - In Qingdao, a seafood store was penalized for using a cheating scale that resulted in a 40g discrepancy in product weight, incurring a fine of 10,000 yuan [3]. - In Xinjiang, a waste recycling shop was caught using unverified scales with a 25% to 30% error rate, resulting in a total illegal income of 10,400 yuan and a fine of 13,100 yuan [4]. - In Dazhou, a property service company was found to have installed unverified prepaid electricity meters, overcharging 226 businesses by 1.668 million yuan, leading to a fine of 96,200 yuan [5]. - In Wuhu, a jewelry store was penalized for using a modified electronic balance that displayed incorrect weights, resulting in a fine of 7,000 yuan [7]. - In Wuhan, a market operator failed to manage vendors using faulty scales, leading to a fine of 5,000 yuan and penalties for three vendors totaling 4,500 yuan [8]. - In Yunnan, a gas station was found to have tampered with fuel dispensers, resulting in a fine of 147,000 yuan and illegal earnings of 145,500 yuan [9]. - In Leshan, a gas station was penalized for using non-compliant fuel dispensers, leading to a fine of 3.3367 million yuan [10]. - In Zhoukou, a gas station was found to have modified fuel dispensers, resulting in illegal earnings of 1.6721 million yuan and a fine of 167,390 yuan [12]. - In Zhanjiang, a gas station was penalized for tampering with fuel dispenser software, leading to a fine of 132,800 yuan [13]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions - The market regulatory authorities are focusing on consumer-related measurement behaviors, utilizing a collaborative mechanism to effectively address measurement and pricing violations [6]. - The crackdown on measurement fraud is aimed at maintaining fair trading order and protecting consumer rights, with a particular emphasis on electronic scales and fuel dispensers [14].

Core Viewpoint - The State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) is intensifying efforts to combat measurement fraud in consumer sectors, focusing on issues such as cheating with electronic scales and fuel dispensers, to protect consumer rights and maintain fair market practices [1]. Group 1: Case Summaries - In Xiamen, a store was found selling electronic scales with cheating functions, leading to the seizure of 7 scales and related equipment, with a total value of over 130,000 yuan [1]. - In Qingdao, a seafood store was penalized for using a cheating scale that resulted in a 40g discrepancy in product weight, receiving a fine of 10,000 yuan [2]. - In Xinjiang, a waste recycling shop was caught using unverified scales with a 25% to 30% error rate, resulting in a total illegal gain of 10,400 yuan and a fine of 13,100 yuan [3]. - In Dazhou, a property management company was penalized for using unqualified electricity meters, overcharging 226 businesses a total of 1.668 million yuan [4][5]. - In Wuhu, a jewelry store was found using a tampered electronic balance, leading to a fine of 7,000 yuan [6]. - In Wuhan, a market operator failed to manage cheating scales used by vendors, resulting in a fine of 5,000 yuan for the market and additional fines for the vendors [7]. - In Yunnan, a gas station was found to have tampered with fuel dispensers, leading to a fine of 147,000 yuan [8]. - In Leshan, a gas station was penalized for using non-compliant dispensers, resulting in a fine of 3.3367 million yuan [10]. - In Zhoukou, a gas station was found to have replaced control boards with non-original parts, leading to a fine of 167,390 yuan [11]. - In Zhanjiang, a gas station was penalized for modifying dispensers, resulting in a fine of 132,800 yuan [12]. Group 2: Regulatory Impact - The crackdown on measurement fraud in the fuel retail industry has helped standardize practices and protect consumer rights [13].

"少了122张。"近日,有网友在社交平台称,自己在某电商平台网购的蓝羚牌A4打印纸,商家标注500张,实 际仅378张,缺页率高达24.4%。 1月13日,齐鲁晚报·齐鲁壹点记者在上述电商平台一店铺购买同品牌、同包装规格的打印纸,选购页面显 示为"一包约500张",但产品外包装上未标注页数,仅有"1900克/包"。 实测发现,该包打印纸仅有409张,缺页率达18.2%。针对该问题,洪晨工厂精品店称可能仓库发错型号,愿 意退款2元补偿差价。 随后,记者联系包装标注厂家四川金穗纸业有限公司,该公司负责人李伟(化名)介绍,厂家根据客户需求生 产、供货,部分订单按重量计量生产,而非按张数。针对商品虚标问题,李伟表示"一些商家为了规避运费 等,产品重量相差几十克很常见。"至于商家如何标注、售卖等与厂家无关。 "出厂的成包纸张正常数量误差就几张。"业内人士暖暖(化名)告诉记者,她向电商供货时均为实标实发, 商家虚标发货可能为仓库发错或者其他原因导致。 记者 岳致呈 杨涛 济南报道 记者向四川省市场监督管理局反映该问题,市监局建议通过成都市12345反馈。提交商家相关信息后,截至 发稿前未收到相关部门回复。 我国《定量包装 ...