Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the increasing adoption of wireless charging technology in vehicles across various price ranges, highlighting the performance differences among popular models tested for charging efficiency and heat generation [1]. Testing Equipment and Process - The testing utilized two smartphones, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro and Huawei P50 Pro, to evaluate charging efficiency and heat generation after 15 minutes of charging on different vehicle models [6]. Charging Performance Comparison - The charging performance of ten popular vehicle models was assessed, revealing that most models achieved or exceeded a 10% charge within 15 minutes, with the exception of the 吉利银河星愿, which only charged the iPhone 13 Pro by 3% [7][8]. - The 吉利银河星愿 excelled in charging the Huawei P50 Pro, achieving a 30% charge, while the AMG S 63 and 华晨宝马i5 performed poorly, both under 5% [8]. Heat Generation Comparison - The heat generation during charging was measured, with the 奇瑞瑞虎8L showing a unique ability to lower the temperature of the iPhone 13 Pro by 12.7 degrees Celsius, while the 特斯拉Model Y maintained a minimal temperature difference of only 0.8 degrees [9][10]. - For the Huawei P50 Pro, the 吉利银河星愿 exhibited a significant temperature increase, while the AMG C 43 and 问界M9 showed minimal temperature change, indicating effective heat management [10]. Wireless Charging Functionality Comparison - Among the ten models, seven supported manual shutdown of the wireless charging function, with several offering both voice and touch screen controls for convenience [11]. - The AMG C 43, AMG S 63, and 特斯拉Model Y lacked the ability to turn off the wireless charging feature, suggesting a potential drawback for users who prefer not to leave their devices charging for extended periods [11]. Summary of Findings - The 极氪7X and 蔚来EC7 demonstrated strong overall performance, achieving over 10% charge for both smartphones and maintaining good heat control, along with versatile charging function controls [12]. - The 奇瑞瑞虎8L also performed well, particularly in heat management, although its charging efficiency for the Huawei P50 Pro was less impressive [12]. - The AMG C 43 and AMG S 63 showed lower charging efficiency and lacked the option to disable wireless charging, indicating areas for improvement [12]. - The results suggest a correlation between vehicle brand, price, and wireless charging performance, though it is not a definitive factor [12].