日前，国家发展改革委一连公布了四则有关输配电定价的修订办法，面向社会公开征求意见，引发业界 对于新型电力系统中有关各环节费用分摊方式的讨论。 这四则正在修订的办法分别是《输配电定价成本监审办法》（下称《监审办法》）《省级电网输配电价 定价办法》《区域电网输电价格定价办法》和《跨省跨区专项工程输电价格定价办法》。其中，《监审 办法》的适用范围最广、关注度最高。对比上一版2019年公布的监审办法，该政策的有效期也从3年延 长至10年。 华北电力大学经济与管理学院教授王永利对第一财经记者表示，《监审办法》有效期的大幅延长，意味 着今后很长一段时间即便改动也是在此框架上的小修小补，明显增强了政策的稳定性和可预期性。也正 因此，业界对即将正式颁布的《监审办法》和第四监管周期电价改革政策抱以高度关注和审慎态度。 "当前有关电价修订的一个核心问题是：发电侧高比例新能源接入所带有的间歇性和波动性特征，以及 用电侧的高峰和低谷的需求波动，两者叠加导致系统运行成本持续攀升，该以何种方式向哪个主体进行 成本疏导。这关系到电网企业的营收来源、用户的电费支出会不会涨、涨多少，还有新能源和储能等行 业的商业模式能否支撑起持续的高速扩张。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent announcement of four revised pricing methods for electricity transmission and distribution has garnered significant attention from electricity users, power sales companies, and investors in the renewable energy sector, focusing on the cost-sharing mechanisms within the new power system [1][2]. Summary by Sections Revision Details - The revised methods include the "Cost Monitoring and Audit Method for Transmission and Distribution Pricing," the "Provincial Grid Transmission and Distribution Pricing Method," the "Regional Grid Transmission Pricing Method," and the "Cross-Province and Cross-Region Special Project Transmission Pricing Method." The "Cost Monitoring and Audit Method" has the broadest applicability and highest attention, with its validity period extended from 3 years to 10 years compared to the previous version published in 2019 [1][3][4]. Cost Structure Changes - The revision clarifies which costs are considered "reasonable expenses" for grid companies, adding items such as "leasing fees," "safety fees," "environmental protection taxes," and "water resource taxes" to the allowable costs, while excluding costs related to pumped storage power stations and new energy storage stations [3][4]. Implications for Pricing and Regulation - The extended validity period and synchronized pricing audits across different grid levels are expected to enhance regulatory efficiency and clarity in asset categorization, thereby improving investment and management effectiveness in the electricity grid sector [4][5]. Industry Concerns - Key concerns raised by industry stakeholders include the definition of "sales electricity" in relation to line losses and the exclusion of new energy storage station costs from transmission pricing, prompting discussions on how to manage these costs effectively [5][6]. Capacity Compensation Mechanisms - Various provinces have begun implementing capacity compensation and pricing mechanisms for new energy storage stations, with compensation rates varying significantly. For instance, Inner Mongolia has set a compensation standard of 0.35 yuan/kWh, while Hebei and Gansu have established capacity pricing standards of 100 yuan/kW and 330 yuan/kW, respectively [7][8]. Future Considerations - The need for a balanced approach to compensating new energy storage resources is emphasized, as under-compensation could hinder sustainable development, while over-compensation could lead to inefficiencies. The industry calls for a comprehensive capacity compensation policy to stabilize investor confidence and ensure system reliability [9][10][11].