Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of establishing an autonomous knowledge system in Chinese philosophy and social sciences, rooted in independence and openness [1][2][4] - Autonomy is identified as the foundation for constructing a distinctive Chinese philosophical and social science knowledge system, requiring a focus on real issues and the application of Marxist dialectics [2][3] - The development of a discourse system must align with Chinese practices and culture, drawing wisdom from traditional culture while formulating core concepts like "common prosperity" [2][3] Group 2 - Openness is essential for enriching the autonomous knowledge system, advocating for global dialogue and the absorption of valuable civilizational achievements [4][5] - The construction of the knowledge system should assert China's subjectivity, showcasing Chinese academic identity and gaining discourse power in the international academic arena [4][5] - A dialectical unity approach is proposed to integrate autonomy and openness, ensuring that research is both independent and globally relevant [5][6] Group 3 - The knowledge generation process should extract concepts from both practical experiences and traditional culture, supporting the originality of the theoretical framework [6][7] - Institutional processes must be established to translate the theoretical framework into actionable mechanisms, including data sharing and international dialogue [7]