Core Insights - Selecting an appropriate ETF arbitrage strategy is crucial for individual investors, considering factors such as capital strength, risk tolerance, professional knowledge, time commitment, and arbitrage space size [1][3]. Group 1: Factors to Consider - Capital strength is essential; strategies like premium-discount arbitrage and cash-futures arbitrage require significant funds, while intraday swing arbitrage and event-driven arbitrage are more suitable for investors with limited capital [1]. - Risk tolerance plays a key role; intraday swing and event-driven arbitrage involve higher risks, while premium-discount and cash-futures arbitrage are more controllable for conservative investors [1]. - Professional knowledge is necessary for premium-discount and cash-futures arbitrage, as they require price trend predictions and basis analysis, making intraday swing and event-driven arbitrage preferable for non-professionals [1]. - Time commitment is a factor; intraday swing arbitrage demands real-time market observation, while event-driven arbitrage requires ongoing information monitoring. Premium-discount arbitrage is more suitable for those with limited time, needing only to track secondary market prices and net asset values [1]. - The size of the arbitrage space is important; selecting ETFs with significant premium-discount effects and low tracking errors can yield higher returns [1]. Group 2: Tools and Strategies - Utilizing quantitative trading tools can significantly reduce the difficulty of arbitrage trading and enhance efficiency [2].

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the importance of selecting suitable ETF arbitrage strategies for individual investors based on their financial strength, risk tolerance, professional knowledge, time availability, and the size of arbitrage opportunities [1][3] - It suggests that investors with limited capital should consider day trading and event-driven arbitrage, while those with more capital can engage in premium-discount and futures arbitrage [1] - The article highlights that different ETF arbitrage strategies have varying risk levels, with premium-discount and futures arbitrage being more controlled in terms of risk compared to day trading and event-driven strategies [1] Group 2 - The need for quantitative trading tools is mentioned, indicating that using algorithmic trading software can significantly reduce the difficulty of arbitrage trading and improve efficiency [2] - The article concludes that by considering the aforementioned factors, individual investors can determine the most suitable ETF investment strategy for themselves [3]

Group 1 - The importance of selecting suitable ETF arbitrage strategies for individual investors is emphasized, considering factors such as capital strength, risk tolerance, professional knowledge, time commitment, and arbitrage space size [1][3] - Individual investors with limited capital should consider day trading and event-driven arbitrage, while those with stronger capital can engage in premium-discount and futures arbitrage [1] - Risk tolerance plays a crucial role, with day trading and event-driven arbitrage being riskier options compared to premium-discount and futures arbitrage, which are more suitable for conservative investors [1] Group 2 - Professional knowledge is essential for premium-discount and futures arbitrage, as they require price trend predictions and basis analysis, making day trading and event-driven arbitrage more accessible for non-professional investors [1] - Time and energy considerations are vital, with day trading requiring real-time market observation and event-driven arbitrage needing continuous information monitoring, while premium-discount arbitrage demands less time [1] - The size of the arbitrage space is critical, as different ETFs exhibit varying arbitrage effectiveness, and selecting ETFs with significant premium-discount effects and low tracking errors can yield higher returns [1][2]