录取原则方面，高校须按照向社会公布的《招生章程》中的录取规则进行录取。对思想政治品德考核合 格、身体健康状况符合相关专业培养要求、投档成绩达到同批录取控制分数线并符合学校调档要求的考 生，是否录取以及所录取的专业由高校自行确定，高校负责对已投档但未被录取考生的退档原因做出解 释。参加本科招生录取的考生总成绩由3门统一高考成绩和考生选考的3门学考等级考成绩构成，总成绩 满分为750分。高校将统一高考成绩、学考等级考成绩作为本科录取的基本依据，同时参考高中学生综 合素质评价档案。 在投档方式方面，按照顺序志愿投档的批次，高校调阅考生档案的比例原则上控制在120%以内。按照 平行志愿投档的批次，调档比例原则上控制在105%以内。同时，顺序志愿按照"志愿优先，从高分到低 分"的原则进行投档，第一志愿录取结束后，若高校招生计划未完成，再对未完成计划进行第二志愿投 档录取。平行志愿按照"分数优先，遵循志愿"的原则，对分数线上未被录取的考生按录取总成绩从高分 到低分排序进行一次性投档。 （文章来源：北京商报） 7月9日，北京市教委发布消息，北京市高招录取工作于7月8日至8月1日分批次进行，考生要关注所报批 次的录取时间安排 ...

Group 1 - The new college entrance examination reform has been implemented in 8 provinces, increasing the total to 29 provinces nationwide [1] - The new examination system adopts a parallel volunteer model, allowing for a significant increase in the number of choices for candidates, with some provinces allowing up to 112 choices [1][7] - The parallel volunteer model enhances the alignment between candidates' interests and their chosen majors, as it combines institutions with specific programs [1] Group 2 - The parallel volunteer admission model reduces the risk of candidates being left without a placement, known as "sliding," but does not eliminate it entirely [5] - Candidates must understand the differences between the two volunteer models: parallel volunteers and sequential volunteers, as the former allows for simultaneous consideration of multiple choices [2][3] - In the traditional sequential model, the first choice is critical, while the parallel model allows for multiple opportunities, reducing the pressure on candidates [3][5] Group 3 - The new examination reform allows candidates to choose their subjects, breaking the traditional division between arts and sciences, and changing the way they fill out their applications [6] - Different provinces have varying maximum numbers of choices, with some allowing over 80, and others like Liaoning allowing up to 112 [7][9] - The reform emphasizes the importance of professional choices while also allowing for flexible major adjustments, reflecting the dual focus on both professional and institutional selection [12][13] Group 4 - There is a debate on whether candidates should prioritize universities or majors when filling out their applications, with some experts suggesting that securing a place in a good university is more important than the specific major [11] - The reform encourages a balance between professional priorities and institutional reputation, with many universities offering flexible major changes [12][13] - The admission process has been streamlined, merging previous undergraduate batches into fewer categories, which requires candidates to strategically plan their applications [13]