Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need for innovative paths in higher education management to align with the requirements of cultivating composite talents in the new era [1][4] - The transformation of educational management must focus on ideological innovation, establishing a political work system that integrates party leadership and student education [2][4] - A "five-in-one" cultivation system for student party members is proposed to enhance ideological education through a structured approach [2] Group 2 - The shift from traditional control-oriented management to a service-oriented model is essential, promoting an inclusive and collaborative organizational culture [2][4] - The implementation of a rapid response mechanism for student and faculty needs is suggested to improve management efficiency and service quality [2] - The focus on a student-centered service philosophy aims to create a positive feedback loop between management and educational outcomes [2] Group 3 - The digital transformation of higher education management is highlighted, with the establishment of an integrated information platform to enhance data sharing and management efficiency [3] - Data-driven decision-making is emphasized as a key feature of intelligent management, allowing for better resource allocation and educational planning [3] - Continuous monitoring of online teaching and learning is recommended to support decision-making processes [3] Group 4 - The construction of a quality culture is crucial for achieving substantive development in higher education, moving from passive compliance to active pursuit of excellence [4] - The synergy between quality assurance systems and cultural development is necessary for effective quality management [4] - The integration of quality concepts into the institution's mission and development plans is essential for fostering a shared value system among faculty and students [4]