摘要 ：新年即将到来之际，仪器信息网特别精选十大关键词，串联起科学仪器行业年度发展的核心轨 迹，复盘行业变革，展望前行方向。 特别提示 微信机制调整，点击顶部"仪器信息网" → 右上方"…" → 设为 ★ 星标，否则很可能无法看到我 们的推送。 春生夏长，秋收冬藏，时序更替间，2 0 2 5年已行至尾声。 2 0 2 5，是"十四五"规划收官之年，也是"十五五"规划谋篇布局之年。这一年，面对加速演进的 世界百年变局、外部风浪与内部转型的挑战，科学仪器行业于变局中砥砺前行，在风浪中破浪 而上。 这是地缘博弈加剧的转折之年： 美国高端仪器出口禁令与中美关税叠加冲击，对全球仪器供应 链稳定性造成了严重冲击； 这亦是自主创新提速的奋进之年： "本国产品"标准落地、科学仪 器"国家队"持续扩容、AI+仪器融合提速，勾勒出科技自立自强的清晰路径。 过往可鉴，未来可期。在2 0 2 6即将到来之际，仪器信息网编辑特别精选十大关键词，串联起科 学仪器行业年度发展的核心轨迹，复盘行业变革，展望前行方向。 01. 美国禁令 精准打击下的国产替代"压力测试" 2 0 2 5开年，美国商务部一纸禁令震动全球仪器圈：未经许可，禁止向中 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the critical transformation point for China's scientific instrument industry by 2025, driven by a series of supportive policies from both central and local governments, aiming to enhance innovation capabilities and upgrade the industry towards high-tech and high-value-added sectors [2][15]. Policy Comparison - A comprehensive comparison of policies from Beijing, Shanghai, Haidian, and Huairou reveals a unified focus on enhancing independent innovation capabilities, with specific goals around core technology breakthroughs, industry ecosystem construction, and nurturing leading enterprises [3][4]. - The policies from city-level authorities focus on top-level design and strategic direction, while district-level policies emphasize precise implementation and local resource advantages, creating a "city-level direction, district-level execution" logic [5][11]. Shanghai vs. Beijing - Both Shanghai and Beijing's action plans target independent innovation and industry upgrades from 2025 to 2027, aiming for significant breakthroughs within three years [6]. - Shanghai's policy emphasizes the integration of scientific instruments and research reagents, while Beijing focuses on optimizing the compatibility of reagents and instruments [8][10]. - In AI+ instruments, Shanghai highlights digital technology integration, whereas Beijing stresses the automation and intelligent upgrades of scientific instruments through AI [8][10]. Haidian vs. Huairou - Haidian's policy is strategic, focusing on the entire high-end scientific instrument industry chain, while Huairou's policy is more detailed, addressing specific implementation measures [11][12]. - Both districts encourage participation in standard-setting, but Haidian specifically aims to develop international standards for high-end scientific instruments [12][13]. Industry Development Goals - The policies collectively aim to enhance technology and product R&D capabilities, foster leading enterprises, and improve the overall industry ecosystem [4][13]. - The focus on key areas includes life sciences, material sciences, and industrial applications, with an emphasis on building a robust innovation ecosystem [12][14]. Conclusion - The article concludes that the convergence of policies and market demands is creating a strong momentum for the scientific instrument industry in China, marking a transition from "following" to "leading" in global markets by 2025 [15].