Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles is that AI writing models have shown significant improvement over the past year, becoming more sophisticated and capable of expressing ideas, although they still lack emotional depth and personal touch compared to human writing [1][2][3] - The ranking of AI models has changed, with Google's Gemini and DeepSeek emerging as top performers, while previous leaders like Yuanbao and Tongyi Qianwen have dropped in rankings [2][3] - The evaluation of AI-written essays indicates that while models can perform well on structured topics, they struggle with more abstract or nuanced prompts, highlighting the limitations of AI in understanding complex human emotions [5][6] Group 2 - The performance of various AI models in the essay evaluation shows a range of scores, with Gemini and DeepSeek achieving average scores of 61.5, while models like ChatGPT and Zhiyu performed poorly, indicating a disparity in capabilities [3][12][14] - The feedback from educators emphasizes that while AI can generate coherent essays, they often lack the depth and emotional resonance that human writers can provide, which is crucial for achieving high scores in subjective evaluations [2][5][20] - The assessment process involved a specific high school essay prompt, which was designed to test the models' ability to engage with contemporary cultural and philosophical themes, further illustrating the challenges AI faces in nuanced writing tasks [6][20]