作者 | 第一财经 刘晓洁、郑栩彤 一年一度高考来临，考生之后，按惯例是各家AI的答题时间。这一年AI模型圈加速迭代进化，让AI写作文，水平会有提高吗？让名师来打分，各大模型的成绩排名有多大变化？ "相较去年，AI进步很快，不再机械单一，变得有思想了。"在看完几家模型的作文后，四川南充市嘉陵一中语文教师李东林对第一财经表示。 2024年，第一财经写了一期九大模型"决战"高考，当时李东林老师在看完AI作文后，认为它们"缺一点情感和灵气"，到今年，他觉得AI已经补上了这方面，但仍达不到细腻。 "人写作，可以刻意抒情和感性，即使是思辨类题目，也需要去契合某些人的感受。"李东林认为，这是AI仍然缺少的部分。 湖南省中学语文特级教师左建国有同样的看法，他觉得Al作文整体有提升，但提升幅度不大。因为有关时代、社会与生活方面的新素材并不多，明显储存不够，尤其是在抒发个人情感方面， 仍然是短板，缺少生命的温度。 左建国老师曾担任高考作文阅卷组的副组长，在高考阅卷方面有十几年的经验。"Al作文已经把考场作文变成一种可计算的拼图，形式上固然能逼近完美，但个性化的思考，以及拨动人心的 语言，几乎没有看到，这是AI与真人思维的真正差 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles is that AI writing models have shown significant improvement over the past year, becoming more sophisticated and capable of expressing ideas, although they still lack emotional depth and personal touch compared to human writing [1][2][3] - The ranking of AI models has changed, with Google's Gemini and DeepSeek emerging as top performers, while previous leaders like Yuanbao and Tongyi Qianwen have dropped in rankings [2][3] - The evaluation of AI-written essays indicates that while models can perform well on structured topics, they struggle with more abstract or nuanced prompts, highlighting the limitations of AI in understanding complex human emotions [5][6] Group 2 - The performance of various AI models in the essay evaluation shows a range of scores, with Gemini and DeepSeek achieving average scores of 61.5, while models like ChatGPT and Zhiyu performed poorly, indicating a disparity in capabilities [3][12][14] - The feedback from educators emphasizes that while AI can generate coherent essays, they often lack the depth and emotional resonance that human writers can provide, which is crucial for achieving high scores in subjective evaluations [2][5][20] - The assessment process involved a specific high school essay prompt, which was designed to test the models' ability to engage with contemporary cultural and philosophical themes, further illustrating the challenges AI faces in nuanced writing tasks [6][20]