Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles indicates that there is no ongoing negotiation between China and the U.S. regarding tariffs, contradicting U.S. claims [1][3] - The Chinese government firmly maintains its economic interests and has responded to U.S. tariff policies with a strong stance, suggesting that the U.S. is not in a favorable position in the tariff negotiations [1][3] - U.S. Treasury Secretary and President Trump have hinted at the possibility of reducing tariffs on China, with potential rates dropping to around 50%-65%, but these statements are viewed as lacking sincerity [1][3] Group 2 - The articles highlight that Trump's tariff policies have negatively impacted the U.S. stock market, leading to investor concerns and a need for false optimism to boost market confidence [3][4] - There is a growing urgency from the Trump administration to bring China to the negotiation table, but the conditions proposed appear increasingly insincere and exploratory [3][4] - The articles also touch on the broader implications of international cooperation, particularly in health initiatives under the Belt and Road Initiative, emphasizing the importance of global health standards and training [4][6]