Core Viewpoint - The rise of "AI magic modification" content on short video platforms raises concerns about cultural heritage, legal boundaries, and technological ethics, highlighting the need for effective governance and legal frameworks [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Risks of AI Magic Modification - "AI magic modification" involves two main types of works: those in the public domain and those still under copyright protection, each presenting different legal risks [1][2]. - Modifying classic works in the public domain can infringe on the author's right to protect the integrity of their work, even after copyright expiration [1]. - Modifying copyrighted works, such as contemporary films, can violate multiple rights including reproduction, adaptation, and integrity rights, complicating legal issues [2]. Group 2: Impact on Youth and Cultural Memory - The realistic nature of AI-generated content can mislead minors, who may struggle to distinguish between fiction and reality, potentially eroding cultural memory and historical facts [3]. - The phenomenon of "AI magic modification" can undermine a nation's cultural confidence by trivializing significant literary and historical works [3]. Group 3: Regulatory and Governance Challenges - Traditional governance frameworks are challenged by the rapid spread and low production barriers of AI-generated content, necessitating new strategies for regulation [4][5]. - Regulatory bodies are actively working to address these challenges, including the implementation of identification measures for AI-generated content [4]. Group 4: Recommendations for Governance - Experts suggest a multi-faceted governance approach involving platforms, regulatory bodies, and industry organizations to create a cooperative system for managing AI content [6]. - There is a call for the development of more intelligent AI recognition systems to handle the volume of content while ensuring necessary human oversight for sensitive topics [5][6]. - The legal framework is deemed sufficient, but effective enforcement and application of existing laws are crucial for balancing innovation and protection of cultural heritage [6][7].