In Brief Meta is facing an AI copyright publisher lawsuit in France accusing it of economic “parasitism,” Reuters reports.The French litigation was filed in a Paris court this week by the National Publishing Union (SNE), the National Union of Authors and Composers (SNAC), and the Society of People of Letters (SGDL), which are accusing Meta of unlawfully training its AI models on their protected content. The case is thought to be the first such action against an AI giant in the country. Meta is facing simil ...

Core Points - A federal judge has allowed an AI-related copyright lawsuit against Meta to proceed, while dismissing part of the claims [1][2] - Authors allege that Meta used their books to train Llama AI models and removed copyright information to conceal infringement [1][3] - Meta argues that its training qualifies as fair use and claims the authors lack standing to sue [2][3] Legal Proceedings - Judge Vince Chhabria indicated that the copyright infringement allegations provide sufficient standing for the authors [3] - The judge criticized the authors' legal teams for "over-the-top" rhetoric during the proceedings [2] - The lawsuit has revealed insights into Meta's approach to copyright, including claims that Mark Zuckerberg authorized the use of copyrighted works for AI training [4] Dismissed Claims - The judge dismissed the authors' claims under the California Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act (CDAFA) due to lack of evidence that Meta accessed their computers or servers [4] - The ongoing legal landscape includes multiple AI copyright lawsuits, such as The New York Times' case against OpenAI [5]