Core Points - A federal appeals court has reinstated Yellow Corp.'s lawsuit against the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, allowing the company to pursue its breach-of-contract case for over $137 million [1][2] - The lawsuit claims the union blocked a critical restructuring plan, "One Yellow," which was deemed necessary for the company's survival [2][3] - Yellow alleges that the union's actions contributed to its financial decline, leading to its closure on July 30, 2023, which resulted in 30,000 job losses [5][6] Legal Proceedings - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit remanded the case back to a federal district court in Kansas, permitting Yellow to amend its complaint [2][7] - The previous dismissal by the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas was based on Yellow's failure to follow internal grievance procedures before filing the lawsuit [6] - The appeals court found that the union's refusal to participate in the grievance process justified Yellow's legal action without exhausting those procedures [7] Union's Response - The Teamsters have labeled Yellow's claims as "unfounded and without merit," asserting that the company is using the union as a scapegoat for its financial troubles [5] - The union contends that the proposed changes in Phase 2 of the restructuring violated the collective bargaining agreement [5] - Teamsters' leadership has publicly stated their unwillingness to make further concessions, indicating a strong opposition to Yellow's restructuring efforts [8]

Core Viewpoint - Andersen Corporation has initiated a lawsuit against ATS Corporation for alleged failure to deliver equipment for a multi-million dollar factory project, impacting the production of high-end E-Series windows [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - Andersen claims ATS missed project deadlines and halted work, attributing the delay to "poor project management," resulting in equipment being 860 days late [2]. - ATS has filed a counterclaim and motion to dismiss, asserting that it suffered damages due to Andersen and Eagle's breach of the project agreement [4]. - The lawsuit has led to unspecified financial damages for Andersen and postponed the launch of its new E-Series product [6]. Group 2: Project Background - Andersen invested millions into the Iowa facility to boost production for the custom homebuilding market [1]. - ATS completed five projects for Andersen-owned facilities prior to the lawsuit, indicating a history of collaboration [4]. - ATS claims that deviations from standard practices and project specifications were not compensated by Andersen, leading to additional costs [5].