Cost Regulation
Search documents
Here's Why You Should Retain Harley Davidson in Your Portfolio Now
ZACKS· 2025-12-31 14:00
Core Insights - Harley-Davidson (HOG) is focusing on high-potential markets in North America, Europe, and select Asia-Pacific regions while facing challenges from rising tariffs, cost inflation, and poor operating leverage [1] Financial Strategies - Long-term strategic partnerships with KKR and PIMCO are expected to enhance Harley-Davidson Financial Services (HDFS) and improve capital structure, with projected discretionary cash of $1.2-$1.25 billion to be unlocked by Q1 2026 [2] - The significant cash inflow could be utilized for debt reduction (targeting $450 million), accelerating buybacks ($200 million ASR under a $1 billion repurchase program through 2026), or funding targeted product and dealer initiatives [3] Operational Efficiency - The revamped operating model and streamlined organizational structure have improved efficiency across all functions, with a focus on high-potential regions after exiting unprofitable markets [4] - The company aims to strengthen market position while driving productivity and reducing supply-chain costs, emphasizing sportier bikes and modern marketing techniques [5] - Cost regulation is a key component of the multi-year productivity cost program, aiming for $400 million in improvements by 2025, with $257 million in unlevered productivity savings realized from 2022 to 2024 [6] Debt Management - As of September 30, 2025, Harley-Davidson's long-term debt was $3.1 billion, down from $4.5 billion at the end of 2024, with a long-term debt-to-capital ratio of approximately 0.46, providing greater financial flexibility [7] Market Challenges - Tariffs are compressing gross margins, with HDMC's gross margin declining to 26.4% in Q3 from 30.1% the previous year, costing $27 million in the quarter and projected to reach $55-$75 million for full-year 2025 [8] - Unfavorable operating leverage and cost inflation pressures are expected to continue affecting profitability, leading to withheld 2025 guidance due to tariff and trade-policy uncertainty [9] Inventory Issues - Global dealer motorcycle inventories are down 13% year-over-year, with concerns primarily in Touring and CVO inventories, prompting targeted promotions to move stock [11]
期刊The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review 2025年第2期目录及摘要|保险学术前沿
13个精算师· 2025-11-16 02:03
Core Insights - The article discusses various studies related to uncertainty preferences, health insurance impacts on life expectancy, and the effectiveness of regulatory measures in the health insurance market [3][5][6]. Group 1: Uncertainty Preferences - The predictive power of measuring individual uncertainty preferences is limited, suggesting a need for improved methodologies in behavioral economics to better inform financial regulation and consumer protection [7][8]. - Uncertainty is a critical factor in economic activities, yet it remains underrepresented in real economic forecasts and assessments [8]. Group 2: Health Insurance and Life Expectancy - A study using a lifecycle model indicates that while health insurance positively influences medical expenditures, its effect on life expectancy is statistically insignificant [9][10]. Group 3: Regulatory Measures in Health Insurance - The introduction of a commission cap in the German private health insurance market reduced commissions paid to intermediaries but did not significantly lower the total acquisition costs for health insurers, highlighting the complexities of cost regulation [10][11]. - The study emphasizes that insurers can easily circumvent regulatory constraints, as commission payments are only a part of the overall acquisition costs [11]. Group 4: Prevention Measures and COVID-19 - A model analyzing interactions in prevention efforts reveals that preventive measures may be under- or over-supplied compared to socially optimal levels, supporting the need for policy interventions like mandatory mask-wearing during the COVID-19 pandemic [12][13]. Group 5: Self-Protection and Health Risks - Research indicates that the effects of income and health on self-protection behaviors are complex and depend on individual risk preferences, revealing an interaction between time dimensions and preference structures in health risk decision-making [14].