RT Matt Forney (@realmattforney)NEW: a former Kohl's employee details how he quit his job in protest of his Indian hiring manager's discriminatory, anti-American hiring practices.According to the whistleblower, his IIT-educated Indian hiring manager had an explicit policy of only hiring fellow Indians on H-1B visas. The whistleblower was the sole non-Indian on his team and was largely there to "prove" that the hiring manager was not engaging in illegal hiring discrimination.When the whistleblower brought up ...

Core Viewpoint - The US government's $8.9 billion investment in Intel raises concerns about cronyism and the unusual nature of government stakes in private companies, especially outside of national emergencies [1][4]. Group 1: Government Investment - The investment is part of the US CHIPS and Science Act, which allocates $52 billion in subsidies and tax incentives to promote domestic chip production and factory construction [2]. - Intel's equity stake will be funded by $5.7 billion in grants from the US CHIPS and Science Act and $3.2 billion from the Secure Enclave program aimed at expanding US semiconductor manufacturing [3]. Group 2: Precedent and Future Implications - It is uncommon for the US government to acquire stakes in private companies, typically occurring during crises like the 2008 financial crisis, suggesting this investment could set a new precedent [4]. - National Economic Council Director indicated that more investments in other companies may follow, comparing the Intel stake to a sovereign wealth fund model [5]. Group 3: Public Benefit Consideration - Concerns were raised about the necessity of the investment unless it serves a broader public benefit, such as enhancing national security [6].