In contrast, SSO gives 2x daily leveraged exposure to the full S&P 500, making it more diversified across sectors—though still tech-heavy, with technology at 31%, cash and others at 30%, and financial services at 9%. Its top holdings include Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft, each with slightly larger portfolio weights than SOXL’s top names. Both funds reset leverage daily, which introduces compounding effects and risk of path-dependent losses.SOXL delivers 3x daily exposure to the NYSE Semiconductor Index, resu ...

Core Insights - The ProShares Ultra QQQ ETF (QLD) and the Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares (SOXL) provide leveraged exposure to technology stocks but have different strategies and risk profiles [1][2] Group 1: Cost and Size - QLD has an expense ratio of 0.95% and assets under management (AUM) of $10.6 billion, while SOXL has a lower expense ratio of 0.75% and AUM of $13.6 billion [3] - The one-year return for QLD is 24.95%, compared to SOXL's 44.62%, indicating SOXL's higher recent performance [3] - SOXL offers a higher dividend yield of 0.53% versus QLD's 0.18% [3] Group 2: Performance and Risk Comparison - Over five years, QLD has a maximum drawdown of -63.68%, while SOXL has a significantly higher drawdown of -90.46% [4] - An investment of $1,000 in QLD would grow to $2,591 over five years, whereas the same investment in SOXL would only grow to $1,491 [4] Group 3: Portfolio Composition - SOXL focuses exclusively on the semiconductor industry, holding around 40 stocks, with major positions in Broadcom, Nvidia, and Advanced Micro Devices [5] - QLD provides broader exposure, with 55% of its assets in technology stocks, 15% in communication services, and 13% in consumer cyclicals, featuring top holdings like Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft [6] Group 4: Investment Implications - SOXL is characterized by higher potential returns due to its 3x leverage on the semiconductor sector, which is known for its volatility [7][9] - QLD, with its 2x leverage and broader focus, presents a less risky option, appealing to investors seeking a more diversified approach [8][10]

Core Insights - The article compares two leveraged ETFs, ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ), focusing on their structure, risk profile, and performance for investors seeking Nasdaq-100 exposure [1][2]. Cost & Size - QLD has an expense ratio of 0.95% and TQQQ has a lower expense ratio of 0.82% - As of December 22, 2025, QLD's one-year return is 28.60% while TQQQ's is 30.72% - TQQQ offers a higher dividend yield of 0.72% compared to QLD's 0.18% - TQQQ has a larger assets under management (AUM) of $30.9 billion versus QLD's $10.6 billion [3]. Performance & Risk Comparison - Over the last five years, QLD experienced a maximum drawdown of -63.68%, while TQQQ faced a more severe drawdown of -81.65% - An investment of $1,000 would have grown to $2,564 with QLD and $2,500 with TQQQ over the same period [4]. Portfolio Composition - TQQQ holds 101 positions, with a focus on technology (55%), communication services (17%), and consumer cyclical (13%) - Major holdings in TQQQ include Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft [5]. Investment Strategy - Both QLD and TQQQ are designed for short-term investments due to their daily leverage reset mechanism, which can lead to significant divergence from the underlying index if held long-term [6][10]. - TQQQ's higher leverage factor aims for three times the daily return, making it potentially more lucrative but also riskier compared to QLD, which targets two times the daily return [8]. Recent Performance Trends - Despite TQQQ's higher risk profile, its 12-month returns have only marginally outperformed QLD, and it has underperformed QLD over the last five years [9].

Both ETFs amplify technology gains, yet QLD leans on broad growth leadership while SOXL turns semiconductor cycles and daily leverage resets into the defining driver of returnsTriple leverage and a pure semiconductor focus set SOXL apart from broader tech ETFs, raising the stakes for tactical investors.ProShares - Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares (SOXL) both offer amplified exposure to tech, but SOXL takes risk to another level with triple leverage and a pure-play semiconducto ...

Core Insights - SSO provides 2x daily exposure to the S&P 500, diversifying risk across 503 holdings, with significant weights in technology, financials, and consumer cyclicals [1] - SOXL focuses on the semiconductor sector with 44 holdings, all from technology, and offers 3x leverage, leading to higher risk and volatility [2][5] - Both SSO and SOXL utilize a daily leverage reset, which can affect long-term returns, especially in volatile markets [5][7] Fund Comparisons - SSO targets the broad S&P 500, while SOXL amplifies the semiconductor sector, resulting in different risk and return profiles [5][10] - SOXL has a lower dividend yield but a lower expense ratio compared to SSO, which may be more relevant for long-term investors [3] - SSO's broader market exposure limits sector concentration risk, while SOXL's focus on semiconductors increases volatility and potential drawdowns [8][9] Investment Considerations - SSO is more stable and diversified, making it suitable for investors with lower risk tolerance, while SOXL offers higher potential returns but with increased volatility [10] - The choice between SSO and SOXL should align with individual risk tolerance and earnings goals, as SOXL's targeted approach can lead to greater fluctuations [10]