A Miami jury has ordered Tesla to pay $243 million over a fatal 2019 Autopilot crash in Florida after a hacker sipping on a Venti-size hot chocolate at a local Starbucks uncovered key vehicle data that the company had claimed it could not find.The verdict, delivered last month in federal court, held Tesla partially liable for the Key Largo wreck that killed 22-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon and left her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, seriously injured.Jurors saw evidence showing that Tesla’s own systems recorded ...

Core Points - A civil trial is set to begin regarding a fatal crash involving a Tesla Model S, where the driver was using the Autopilot feature at the time of the incident [2][10] - The lawsuit claims that Tesla's Autopilot system is defective and unsafe, alleging that the company exaggerated its capabilities while downplaying its deficiencies [9][11] - The judge overseeing the case has allowed claims of design defect and failure to warn against Tesla to proceed, while dismissing claims of manufacturing defect and negligent misrepresentation [10][12] Group 1: Incident Details - The crash occurred in 2019, resulting in the death of Naibel Benavides Leon and serious injuries to Dillon Angulo [1][2] - The Tesla driver, George McGee, stated he was distracted by his phone when the crash happened, impacting the parked Chevrolet Tahoe at approximately 60 miles per hour [2][3] Group 2: Legal Proceedings - The trial is expected to last about three weeks, with Tesla's safety features under scrutiny [3] - The plaintiffs have the potential to seek punitive damages if the jury finds Tesla liable [10][11] - The judge indicated that there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a defect in the Autopilot system was a significant factor in the injuries sustained [11] Group 3: Tesla's Defense - Tesla's legal team argues that the driver was solely responsible for the crash, emphasizing that Autopilot is intended for use by attentive drivers [12][13] - The company maintains that while Autopilot can assist in driving, it does not make the vehicle autonomous and requires driver oversight [12][13] Group 4: Broader Context - Tesla has faced multiple lawsuits regarding its Autopilot software and has been under increased regulatory scrutiny [14] - In previous cases, Tesla has successfully defended itself against claims of liability related to Autopilot, arguing that human error was the primary cause of accidents [15][16]