Core Viewpoint - GraniteShares has announced the weekly distributions for its YieldBOOST ETFs, highlighting the specific amounts and performance metrics for each fund [1][2]. Distribution Details - The distribution for the GraniteShares YieldBOOST MAAY ETF is $0.44735 per share, with a distribution rate of 152.95% and a 30-day SEC yield of 1.35% [2]. - The GraniteShares YieldBOOST IONQ ETF (IOYY) has a distribution of $0.54337 per share, a distribution rate of 151.75%, and a 30-day SEC yield of 0.70% [2]. - The GraniteShares YieldBOOST RIOT ETF (RTYY) offers a distribution of $0.60435 per share, with a distribution rate of 150.27% [2]. - The GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF (COYY) has a distribution of $0.24639 per share, a distribution rate of 148.51%, and a 30-day SEC yield of 2.36% [2]. - The GraniteShares YieldBOOST SPY ETF (SEMY) provides a distribution of $0.57239 per share, with a distribution rate of 141.61% and a 30-day SEC yield of 1.49% [2]. - The payment date for all distributions is set for December 30, 2025, with a record date of December 26, 2025 [2][9]. Performance Metrics - The 30-day SEC yield for the GraniteShares YieldBOOST ETFs varies, with the highest being 2.36% for COYY and the lowest being 0.25% for the AMZN ETF (AZYY) [2][3]. - The distribution rates for the ETFs indicate a high return potential, with several ETFs exceeding 150% [2][3]. Fund Strategy - Each GraniteShares YieldBOOST ETF aims to generate income by selling put options on the underlying assets, which can lead to attractive premiums but may cap upside potential [7].

Core Insights - The ETF market is becoming increasingly competitive, making it difficult for issuers to find distribution space for new funds, especially for actively managed ETFs and those with innovative strategies [2][3] - A survey by Cerulli Associates revealed that 71% of asset managers find it challenging to secure shelf space for active ETFs on broker/dealer platforms, with 96% citing home approval on models/lists as a moderate challenge for ETF distribution [2][4] Distribution Channels - ETF issuers prefer wirehouses as the primary channel for growth, with 38% of respondents ranking them as their top choice, while 29% prefer independent and hybrid RIAs [4] - Independent broker/dealers and ETF model providers are seen as growth opportunities by only 13% of respondents each [4] Challenges in Placement - Limited shelf space and the short track record of new ETFs are significant barriers for asset managers in placing their products on broker/dealer platforms [5] - Broker/dealers typically require a minimum asset threshold of approximately $50 million to $100 million in AUM for ETF listings, which not all issuers achieve within the first year [6] Regulatory Considerations - Broker/dealers must adhere to the SEC's Regulation Best Interest rule, which complicates the approval of ETFs with less reliable track records, such as leveraged ETFs or those investing in emerging asset classes like cryptocurrency [7] - Active managers face additional challenges as broker/dealer firms often require a performance track record before approving funds for their platforms [7]

Core Insights - The article discusses the importance of enabling Javascript and cookies in browsers to ensure proper functionality and access to content [1] Group 1 - The article highlights that users may face access issues if they have an ad-blocker enabled, suggesting the need to disable it for a better experience [1]