Core Insights - The article compares two ETFs: the State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) and the iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA), highlighting their unique investment opportunities for foreign exposure and climate-conscious investing [2][9]. Cost & Size Comparison - NZAC has an expense ratio of 0.12% and AUM of $182.12 million, while IEFA has a lower expense ratio of 0.07% and AUM of $171.77 billion [3][4]. - The one-year return for NZAC is 15.11%, compared to IEFA's 28.70%, and the dividend yield for NZAC is 1.88%, while IEFA offers a higher yield of 3.32% [3][4]. Performance & Risk Analysis - Over five years, NZAC has a max drawdown of -28.29% and has grown $1,000 to $1,499, while IEFA has a max drawdown of -30.41% and has grown $1,000 to $1,353 [5]. Holdings Overview - IEFA focuses on developed markets outside the U.S. and Canada, with 2,589 holdings, primarily in financial services (22%), industrials (20%), and healthcare (11%) [6]. - NZAC targets climate-aligned companies with 729 stocks, heavily weighted in technology (32%), followed by financial services (16%) and industrials (10%) [7]. Investment Implications - Investors must choose between a more American-focused ETF (NZAC) or a more international exposure (IEFA), with NZAC showing stronger long-term performance over five years despite lower one-year returns [9][10]. - NZAC includes international companies in its holdings, providing some level of global exposure, while IEFA's performance may be influenced by foreign market volatility [10][11].

Core Insights - The Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and SPDR Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF (SPDW) are designed to provide broad exposure to developed markets outside the United States, with both funds maintaining low expense ratios of 0.03% [4][7][8] - SCHF holds 1,499 stocks with a sector mix of 25% financial services, 18% industrials, and 12% technology, while SPDW holds 2,390 stocks with a sector mix of 23% financial services, 19% industrials, and 11% technology [1][2] - SCHF has a slightly lower beta of 0.86 compared to SPDW's beta of 0.88, indicating that SCHF is marginally less volatile [5][7] Fund Characteristics - SCHF has approximately $58 billion in assets under management (AUM), while SPDW has around $35 billion in AUM, suggesting a significant size difference [8] - The top holdings for SCHF include Asml Holding Nv, Samsung Electronics Ltd, and Roche, while SPDW's top holdings are Roche Holding Ag, Novartis Ag, and Toyota Motor Corp [1][2] - Both funds have experienced a maximum drawdown of about -30% over the same period, indicating similar risk profiles [7] Performance Metrics - Over the last five years, a $1,000 investment in SCHF would have grown to $1,593, while the same investment in SPDW would have grown to $1,567, showing that SCHF has outperformed SPDW in terms of growth [5] - SCHF offers a marginally higher dividend yield compared to SPDW, making it more attractive for income-focused investors [3][5]

Core Insights - The SPDR Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) provide broad international exposure, with SPDW focusing on developed markets and VXUS including both developed and emerging markets [2] Cost & Size Comparison - VXUS has an expense ratio of 0.05% and AUM of $573.72 billion, while SPDW has a lower expense ratio of 0.03% and AUM of $35.07 billion [3] - The 1-year return for VXUS is 31.69% compared to SPDW's 32.6%, and the dividend yield for VXUS is 3.02% versus SPDW's 3.14% [3][4] Performance & Risk Metrics - Over five years, VXUS has a max drawdown of -29.43% and a growth of $1,000 to $1,256, while SPDW has a max drawdown of -30.20% and a growth of $1,000 to $1,321 [5] Holdings Overview - SPDW holds 2,413 stocks with a sector tilt towards financials, industrials, and consumer cyclical, featuring top holdings like ASML Holding N.V., Samsung Electronics, and Roche Holding AG [6] - VXUS is broader with 8,673 holdings, including top positions such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd., Tencent Holdings Ltd., and ASML Holding N.V. [7] Investor Considerations - International stocks in these ETFs may exhibit different price movements compared to U.S. stocks, influenced by the economic and political conditions of the respective countries [8] - SPDW's top holdings are primarily European, while VXUS has a significant presence in Asian companies, indicating different regional exposures [10]

Core Insights - The Fidelity International High Dividend ETF (FIDI) provides equity investors with a means to diversify portfolios and achieve dividend income [1] Group 1: Fund Structure and Methodology - FIDI tracks the Fidelity International High Dividend Index, which selects over 100 constituents based on a proprietary methodology [1] - Companies are grouped by country and sector, then assigned a composite score based on fundamental metrics to identify attractive dividend characteristics [2] - The index adjusts scores to eliminate small size bias, selecting those with the highest scores for inclusion [3] Group 2: Geographic and Market Capitalization Exposure - The fund offers diversified exposure to countries such as the United Kingdom, Japan, Canada, France, and Australia, focusing on large- and midcap stocks [4] - The fund avoids small-cap companies and emerging markets to reduce volatility [4] Group 3: Sector Exposure and Weighting - Stocks are selected based on high exposure to targeted factors and weighted by market capitalization, with an additional overweight adjustment for all stocks in a sector [5] - The fund currently has a significant tilt towards the financial sector, which comprises 33% of its exposure, along with consumer staples, materials, industrials, and utilities [6] Group 4: Cost Efficiency and Yield - FIDI has a low net expense ratio of 19 basis points, equating to $19 per $10,000 invested, appealing to cost-conscious investors [7] - The fund has a 30-day SEC yield of 4.18% as of October 14, indicating potential for sustainable dividends [7]

Retail investors have been ditching UK equity funds for international exposure in recent years, according to a new report https://t.co/yNB7WJxFSQ ...