Workflow
International reference pricing
icon
Search documents
1 Ultra-High-Yield Dividend Stock Down 57% to Buy Hand Over Fist
The Motley Fool· 2025-05-24 08:51
Core Viewpoint - Pfizer's stock has significantly declined, presenting a potential buying opportunity despite underlying challenges [2][3][7] Company Challenges - Pfizer's stock decline is primarily due to rapidly decreasing sales of COVID-19 products, compounded by vaccine skepticism and reduced pandemic concerns [3] - The company faced setbacks with product withdrawals, including the sickle cell disease therapy Oxbryta and the oral obesity drug danuglipron due to safety concerns [4] - Patent expirations for key drugs, such as Inlyta, Xeljanz, and Eliquis, are imminent, which could impact revenue [5] - Potential regulatory challenges from the Trump administration, including tariffs and international reference pricing, add to the uncertainty [6][12] Market Sentiment - Despite the challenges, there is a level of optimism among analysts, with 8 out of 25 rating Pfizer as a buy or strong buy, and an average 12-month price target indicating a 28% upside potential [7] - Pfizer's reliance on COVID-19 product sales has decreased, with these products accounting for less than 7.7% of total revenue in Q1 2025 [8] Growth Prospects - Pfizer is exploring patent term extensions and has several promising products in its pipeline that could offset revenue losses from expiring patents [9] - The company is actively seeking business development opportunities, including licensing agreements and potential acquisitions to enhance its product offerings [11] Financial Metrics - Pfizer's shares are trading at over 8 times forward earnings, with a low price-to-earnings-to-growth (PEG) ratio of 0.6, indicating attractive valuation relative to growth prospects [14] - The forward dividend yield stands at 7.47%, and despite a high payout ratio of 122.5%, Pfizer has sufficient free cash flow and anticipates $7.2 billion in cost savings by 2027 [15] Conclusion - Overall, Pfizer is positioned to navigate its challenges effectively, with a low stock price and high dividend yield suggesting solid total return potential [16][17]
Is the Trump Administration About to Cause AbbVie, Eli Lilly, and Johnson & Johnson Stocks to Crash?
The Motley Fool· 2025-05-04 08:49
Core Viewpoint - Pharmaceutical stocks are generally considered safe investments during market volatility, as their underlying businesses remain stable regardless of economic fluctuations [1] Group 1: Market Performance - The three largest pharmaceutical companies by market capitalization—AbbVie, Eli Lilly, and Johnson & Johnson—have shown solid stock gains this year, even as major market indexes have declined [2] Group 2: Tariff Concerns - Johnson & Johnson has included approximately $400 million in its 2025 guidance to account for potential tariff impacts, specifically on its medtech business [4] - President Trump announced plans to impose a "major tariff" on drug imports, indicating a forthcoming "tariff wall" that could disrupt supply chains and lead to shortages [4][5] - AbbVie’s CEO expressed skepticism about the ability to pass increased costs from tariffs onto customers due to existing contractual penalties and government regulations [6] Group 3: International Reference Pricing - The Trump administration is considering international reference pricing for Medicare and Medicaid drugs, which could significantly impact revenue for AbbVie, Lilly, and Johnson & Johnson [8][9] - The pharmaceutical industry organization PhRMA warns that international reference pricing could lead to delays in access to medications, fewer new therapies, and diminished U.S. leadership in biopharmaceutical innovation [9] - Each of the three companies has high-cost medications under Medicare Part D, making them particularly vulnerable to revenue reductions if international reference pricing is implemented [9] Group 4: Future Outlook - Despite concerns over tariffs and international pricing strategies, there is no immediate expectation of a stock crash for AbbVie, Lilly, and Johnson & Johnson [10] - The Trump administration has indicated that drugmakers will have time to adjust their manufacturing processes before tariffs take effect, and the companies are already investing in U.S. facilities [11] - Previous attempts to implement international reference pricing were blocked by legal challenges, suggesting that future efforts may also face significant opposition [12]
Should Investors Be Worried About Dividend King AbbVie?
The Motley Fool· 2025-04-28 08:42
Core Viewpoint - AbbVie's Q1 results showed strong revenue growth of 8.4% year over year, driven by autoimmune disease drugs Skyrizi and Rinvoq, and the company raised its full-year earnings guidance, but potential tariff issues and international reference pricing pose significant risks to its future performance [1][4][5]. Group 1: Financial Performance - AbbVie's revenue increased by 8.4% year over year, primarily due to the success of Skyrizi and Rinvoq [1]. - The company exceeded Wall Street's expectations for both revenue and earnings in Q1 [1]. - AbbVie raised its full-year earnings guidance, although it included a disclaimer regarding potential trade policy changes [4]. Group 2: Tariff Concerns - Current tariffs have not impacted AbbVie, as pharmaceuticals were exempt from the Trump administration's tariffs [2]. - President Trump announced plans for a major tariff on pharmaceuticals, aiming to encourage domestic manufacturing [3]. - CEO Robert Michael indicated that any tariff impacts would likely align with those faced by peers, and AbbVie would not pass on price increases to customers but may seek cost efficiencies [4][9]. Group 3: International Reference Pricing - The Trump administration is considering implementing international reference pricing, which could significantly affect U.S. drug prices and pose an "existential threat" to the industry [5][6]. - Michael expressed concerns about the potential negative impact of international reference pricing on U.S. healthcare and innovation during the Q1 earnings call [7]. - Previous attempts to implement such pricing were halted by federal courts, and any new efforts may face strong lobbying from the pharmaceutical industry [10].