Workflow
Investment Advisory Compliance
icon
Search documents
时隔仅一年又吃罚单,珞珈投资被暂停新增客户六个月
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2026-01-26 10:11
Core Viewpoint - Shenzhen Luojia Investment Consulting Co., Ltd. has been penalized again for regulatory violations, indicating a failure to learn from previous sanctions [2][5] Group 1: Regulatory Violations - The Shenzhen Securities Regulatory Bureau issued a decision mandating Luojia Investment to rectify issues and suspend new client acquisition for six months due to false and misleading marketing content, inadequate investor suitability management, and insufficient internal controls [2][3] - Specific violations include misleading marketing, unauthorized stock recommendations by investment advisors, and reliance on third-party institutions for compliance tasks [2][4] Group 2: Company Background - Luojia Investment is one of the earliest third-party advisory firms, established in 1998, and claims to be a leading institution in the domestic consulting industry [3] - The company holds a Securities Investment Consulting Business License and a license for online audiovisual program dissemination from the National Radio and Television Administration [3] Group 3: Historical Context - Luojia Investment has a history of regulatory issues, having previously faced sanctions in early 2025 for multiple violations related to marketing and advisory services, resulting in a three-month suspension of new client acquisition [4][5] - The company's chairman, Chen Jie, was subjected to regulatory discussions due to these violations, and another employee faced similar measures for disseminating misleading information [4]
前三季度第三方投顾机构吃罚单50余张,过半涉及误导性宣传
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-09-25 10:31
Core Viewpoint - Sichuan QianKun Cloud Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. has been ordered to rectify its operations due to inadequate securities investment advisory management and compliance mechanisms, reflecting broader issues within the third-party advisory industry in China [2][3][4]. Group 1: Company Issues - Sichuan QianKun Cloud has been penalized twice this year for compliance issues, including inadequate management mechanisms and misleading promotional practices [3][4]. - The company was found to have violated the Interim Regulations on Securities Investment Advisory Business, leading to administrative supervision measures [3]. - The company, established in 1997 with a registered capital of 30 million yuan, offers various financial services, including investment consulting and asset management [3]. Group 2: Industry Overview - A total of 53 penalties have been issued to third-party advisory institutions this year, with over half related to misleading promotional practices [6][7]. - Beijing Tianxiang Wealth Management Co., Ltd. has received the highest number of penalties, totaling four, indicating a trend of compliance issues across the industry [6]. - The most common violations include misleading advertising and unqualified personnel providing advisory services, with 28 out of 53 penalties citing misleading promotions [7].
屡“吃”罚单的慧研智投:老牌投顾机构,被罚多涉误导性宣传
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-05-23 07:31
Core Viewpoint - Huiyan Zhito Technology Co., Ltd. has faced multiple penalties for business violations, including misleading marketing and promises of guaranteed returns, indicating significant compliance issues within the company [2][3][4]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The Guangdong Securities Regulatory Bureau recently mandated Huiyan Zhito's Guangzhou branch to rectify its operations due to violations such as implying guaranteed returns and providing investment advice without reasonable basis [3]. - In the past year, Huiyan Zhito has been penalized five times for various infractions, including misleading promotions and false statements [3][4]. - The company was fined 1.8 million yuan by the Shanxi Securities Regulatory Bureau for misleading marketing messages, marking it as the highest penalty among third-party advisory firms in 2024 [4]. Group 2: Specific Violations - The recent violations by Huiyan Zhito include failing to conduct regular suitability self-assessments, misleading marketing content, and providing investment advice by unregistered employees [3][5]. - Specific misleading statements made by employees included claims like "buying will guarantee profits" and "the stock will rise regardless of market conditions," which were deemed deceptive [4][5]. - The company has faced scrutiny for inadequate internal controls and failure to execute appropriate investor suitability management [5][6]. Group 3: Company Background - Huiyan Zhito, established in 1995 with a registered capital of 50 million yuan, is an old player in the third-party advisory sector, having changed its name multiple times since inception [6]. - The company has a history of rebranding approximately every five years, which raises questions about its operational stability [6]. - Despite its compliance issues, Huiyan Zhito has launched an investor education base aimed at promoting risk awareness and rational investment practices [6][7].