Core Insights - The 2025 Aflac Time Away Study reveals that nearly 75% of employees experience workplace stress or anxiety when covering for a peer on leave, highlighting the significant challenges faced during these periods [1][5][6] - The study emphasizes the need for proactive leave management practices to mitigate burnout and maintain employee morale, urging employers to adopt a holistic approach to leave management [2][3] Employee Well-Being and Productivity - 41% of employees reported experiencing burnout when a co-worker's leave extended beyond eight weeks, indicating a direct correlation between extended leave and employee stress levels [2][5] - Mental well-being dropped by 11 percentage points for employees covering for peers, showcasing the mental health impact of increased workloads [5] - 73% of employees experienced at least moderate workplace stress or anxiety while covering for a peer, underscoring the need for effective support systems [5] Health Impacts - 27% of employees diagnosed with a new health condition during or after their coverage period attributed it to the increased workload, indicating a significant health risk associated with covering for absent colleagues [5] - 18% of workers reported that a preexisting condition worsened while covering for a peer, further illustrating the health implications of additional responsibilities [5] Recognition and Support - 29% of employees stated they did not receive any recognition for their additional work, despite 95% of leaders claiming access to recognition tools, highlighting a gap in acknowledgment of employee efforts [5] - Employers are encouraged to implement strategies that include clear communication, regular check-ins, and support tools to prevent burnout and enhance employee engagement [3][4] Recommendations for Employers - Aflac suggests that employers should create robust leave contingency plans that foster a culture of communication, recognition, and support to minimize the negative impacts identified in the study [3][4] - The study calls for leaders to be aware of the toll that longer leave coverage takes on employees, particularly tenured staff who may seem better equipped to handle increased workloads [4]