Core Viewpoint - South Korea's Digital Asset Basic Act (DABA) has been delayed due to disagreements among regulators regarding stablecoin issuance, particularly concerning who should have the authority to issue KRW-pegged stablecoins [1][2]. Regulatory Disagreements - The Bank of Korea (BOK) insists that only banks with majority (51%) ownership should be allowed to issue stablecoins, citing their existing solvency and anti-money-laundering requirements as a basis for ensuring financial stability [2]. - The Financial Services Commission (FSC) argues against the strict "51% rule," suggesting it could hinder competition and innovation by excluding fintech firms capable of developing scalable blockchain infrastructure [3][4]. - The FSC references the European Union's Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation, which allows digital asset firms to issue stablecoins, and Japan's fintech-led yen stablecoin projects as examples of regulated innovation [4]. Political and Expert Opinions - The ruling Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) opposes the BOK's proposal, with experts expressing concerns that the 51% rule may not foster innovation or strong network effects [5]. - DPK lawmaker Ahn Do-geol emphasizes that stability concerns could be addressed through regulatory and technological measures rather than strict ownership requirements [5]. Foreign Issued Stablecoins - The FSC's earlier draft proposed allowing foreign-issued stablecoins in South Korea if they are licensed and have a local branch or subsidiary, impacting issuers like Circle, which issues USDC [6]. Legislative Timeline - The regulatory deadlock is expected to delay the passage of the DABA until at least January, with full implementation now unlikely before 2026, marking a significant shift for a country that previously banned crypto for nine years [7].